Tuesday, September 30, 2008

CHP busy with California DUI cases over weekend

California drunk driving criminal defense lawyers at www.SanDiegoDUIhelp.com say California Highway Patrol officers made a significant amount of arrests Friday and Saturday nights during their increased patrol of California DUI - driving-under-the- influence offenders.

Eight California DUI patrol units arrested 20 individuals in Oroville Friday night and 32 in Chico Saturday night, as part of the Rapid Apprehension of Impaired Drivers program.

The program uses grant-funded overtime to increase the number of officers on patrol and deploy them to locations that have historically seen a high incidence of DUI traffic accidents, according to California drunk driving criminal defense lawyers.

Other cities where California DUI deployments have occurred include South Sacramento, Stockton, Auburn and South Lake Tahoe, California DUI attorneys say.

www.sandiegodui.com

Monday, September 29, 2008

Bad DUI bill signed by California Governor

California DUI atorneys unfortunately have some bad news:

On Saturday night, the Governor vetoed (the Correa) legislation which would have fairly given drivers on a 2nd California DUI and 3rd California DUI the reasonable option of obtaining an interlock device in exchange for a restricted license.

The Terminator star instead signed a bad California DUI bill, SB 1388 which gives California DMV oversight of interlock device compliance and sets time periods for interlock sentences among other things. Just what California DMV needs!

www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net/about

Heather Locklear busted for California DUI

California DUI attorneys report - Actress Heather Locklear was arrested over the weekend in California, on suspicion of California DUI - driving under the influence of some type of prescription medication.

She was pulled over in Santa Barbara, California over the weekend after a civilian called 911 on the actress.

She was allegedly said to be driving erratically, without any real control over the car.

Locklear, 47- was arrested for California DUI and taken to the police station.

She was tested for alcohol and drugs, and was later released. It is unknown whether the unidentified civilian was also tested.

California DUI reports from the California Highway Patrol claim that she was under the influence of something, funny thing is they just do not know what at this point.

She allgedly has been suffering from anxiety, as well as depression over recent months. With the economy and W. still in there, who wouldn't be depressed.

www.SanDiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/articles

Click to contact San Diego California DUI Attorneys:

San Diego California DUI Lawyer


San Diego California DUI Attorney


California DUI Attorney


San Diego California DUI Help

Friday, September 26, 2008

DUI bill battle in California

California DUI attorneys are told Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) and their supporters took a stand against the American Beverage Institute (ABI) in an argument over a new bill in California that MADD believes will greatly reduce the incidence of drunk driving. The ignition interlock bill AB2784 would require breathalyzers to be installed in cars after a first conviction of DUI, something MADD says will save hundreds of lives. The alcohol ignition interlock is an electronic device that is linked to the ignition system of a vehicle, and when someone wants to start the vehicle they must first blow into the device with a blood alcohol concentration below a preset level. Studies show that interlock devices are 65 percent effective in reducing drunken driving offenses.

American Beverage Institute, a restaurant trade association, is against the penalties this bill would put on first time offenders. According to both MADD and ABI, the greatest threat on our roads comes from drivers with very high blood alcohol concentration and more than one DUI conviction. ABI believes that this bill would target the wrong groups of offenders when what we really want to do is get the “hard core” alcohol abusers off the road. ABI has some suggestions of their own on how to curb drunk driving, such as putting more patrols out on the roads looking specifically for drunk drivers. By doing this, ABI says, offenders wouldn’t be able to predict where they may get caught, as they would with the sobriety checkpoints that MADD is also campaigning for.


MADD has a long history of fighting drunk driving, and their new Campaign to Eliminate Drunk Driving is another way they are helping to make our roads safer. Even if they are targeting first time offenders as well as seasoned drunk drivers, do we really want anyone behind the wheel that has had too much to drink? And who knows, by implementing stricter penalties for even the first crime, maybe fewer people will go on to be repeat offenders.

ABI has some good ideas themselves on how to fight drunk driving. By focusing on a long term screening and alcoholism treatment process for offenders, they have shown that they understand the help that people with alcoholism need in order to change their behavior.

Although both sides have their own opinions on the issue, they both have said that education is the key to solving this public safety problem. And like the rest of us in this country, they want to work toward safer roads. www.sandiegoduihelp.com

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Thursday night California DUI checkpoint California State Northridge, Concord, Martinez areas

California DUI criminal defense attorneys are told California State Northridge’s police department and members of the California Highway Patrol will join forces to conduct a California DUI sobriety checkpoint on Thursday, Sept. 25, in an effort to target California DUI drunk drivers.

The California DUI checkpoint is the first of several endeavors on behalf of the university police department and Klotz Student Health Care Center to draw attention to the dangers of drinking and driving. A second California DUI checkpoint is scheduled for next spring along with a driving vehicle simulator brought to campus.

“This academic year we are partnering with the CHP to conduct checkpoints with a simulator vehicle that will enact delayed response time due to alcohol impairment,” said Capt. Alfredo Fernandez. “By providing a balance of enhanced enforcement and education to the community, we hope to reduce the number of drivers under the influence.”

Partially funded by the California Office of Traffic Safety, the goal of the California DUI checkpoints is to reduce accidents related to California DUI drunk driving, said Marianne Link, assistant director of health promotion for the Klotz Center.

“We want to make sure our students and community are safe and healthy,” she said. “Sobriety checkpoints play a key role in this effort.”

California Highway Patrol officers will hold a DUI checkpoint Thursday in unincorporated Martinez, while Concord police will conduct a saturation patrol along a major arterial route the same day.

The CHP will conduct its checkpoint from 9 p.m. Thursday to 3 a.m. Friday along Pacheco Boulevard. In addition to checking for possible intoxication, officers will be checking motorists for valid driver's licenses.

The Concord saturation patrol will be held along Clayton Road on Thursday, from downtown to Ygnacio Valley Road, as well as other major roads, police said.

Drivers caught speeding, running red lights, or talking on their cell phones without a handless device will be ticketed, as will anyone caught not wearing a seatbelt.




www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/blog

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Don't make California DUI police chase you

California DUI lawyers have enough to deal with in drunk driving cases, yet alone a chase. www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/blog

Two drivers were hospitalized this morning following a police pursuit that ended with a crash in Long Beach. The chase began around 11:30 p.m. Monday at Edwards Street and Westminster Boulevard in Westminster when officers tried to pull over a man suspected of DUI, California DUI attorneys said.

The driver led police on a street chase through Westminster, Seal Beach and Long Beach.

About 15 minutes later, the pursuit ended on East 7th Street in Long Beach, where the man ran a red light at Redondo Avenue, striking another car, California DUI attorneys said. The woman inside that car was taken to a hospital with a minor cut to the head and complaints of chest pains, California DUI attorneys said.

The suspect was also taken to the hospital for head injuries, but was later cleared to be transferred to the Orange County Jail.

Police later learned the man was named in a $250,000 warrant for drug violations.
California DUI attorneys said the suspect, whose name was not immediately released, was believed to be under the influence of drugs or alcohol during the chase.


In other chase news, a man got ten years in state prison after he pleaded to DUI - driving under the influence of alcohol and causing injury, evading police with reckless driving and possession of rock cocaine.

On Oct. 13, 2005, California Highway Patrol officers attempted to stop Horton for a traffic violation in Modesto, but he sped away. Horton made numerous traffic violations and almost hit another vehicle. The pursuit ended when Horton crashed into a brick wall, injuring his passenger.

Horton had a blood alcohol level of 0.11 percent and had the cocaine in his pocket during the chase.

The legal threshold to be deemed driving drunk is 0.08 percent.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

California DUI cases go down, negligent operator update

California DUI criminal defense lawyers report California posted the greatest decrease in drunken driving deaths last year according to data released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Nationwide alcohol-related traffic fatalities decreased by 4% from 2006 with fatality rates falling in 32 states. www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/about

California had 117 fewer alcohol-impaired driving deaths in 2007. A driver is considered drunk when he has a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.08%. According to the study, 15% of all drivers reported driving under the influence of alcohol at some time during the past year.

Last year, nearly 13,000 people died in vehicle crashes involving a drunk driver, down from 13,500 in 2006. Led by Wisconsin where more than a quarter of adult motorists reported driving drunk, states in the upper Midwest posted the worst drunk-driving rates in the country. Utah, where less than 10% of adult motorists reported driving under the influence, had the lowest incidence of drunk driving, followed by Southeastern states (11%) where religious beliefs often discourage drinking.

Unfortunately, alcohol-related fatalities among motorcycle riders increased in 50% of the country’s states. The 1,621 motorcycle deaths attributed to drunk driving last year constituted an increase of 7.5% from the previous year. “

Like many state, California vigorously pursues drunk drivers. A charge of DUI (driving under the influence), Drunk Driving or DWI results in two cases: a California criminal case and a California Department of Motor Vehicles case. A conviction of DUI in California can result in heavy fees, penalties, loss of driving privileges and even jail time. If you lose your driving privileges, you risk jeopardizing your job if, like most Californians, you rely on your vehicle to get to and from work.

California DUI convictions also accumulate points against your license. If you accumulate too many points on your driving record, you can be charged as a negligent operator and your license suspended or restricted. In California, you can be considered a negligent operator if you accumulate:

4 or more points in 12 months,
6 points in 24 months, or
8 points in 36 months.

Point counts may include tickets received in other states. When 2 points are accumulated, a warning letter is issued, followed by a notice of intent to suspend at 3 points and suspension with probation at 4 points. If you violate the terms of your probation, the state can permanently revoke your driver’s license. If you are charged with DUI in California, a California criminal defense attorney with experience in DUI/Drunk Driving and negligent operator cases can make the difference between keeping your license and losing it. Your California DMV lawyer will make the right objections, arguments and requests. www.sandiegodui.com

Monday, September 22, 2008

Tough DUI laws in California as many drive drunk without getting caught

California DUI lawyers at www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net are told a common problem that is found in the United States as well as the rest of the world it the problem of drunk driving. Driving under the influence or DUI as it is known in the U.S. is the act of driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol or in inebriated condition.

More than 30 million Americans will hit the road this Labor Day weekend for one last summer road trip. But a new survey indicates many of those drivers admit they may be driving while under the influence of alcohol.

One in 12 American adults admit they may have driven while drunk within the last year. A survey found that 7 percent of American adults say they have driven within the last 12 months even though they thought they may have been over the legal blood alcohol limit for drinking and driving in their state.

Males were almost three times more likely than women to say they have driven when they thought they were above the legal limit

Young adult drivers -- ages 18 to 34 -- were more than twice as likely as older drivers to admit the same behavior

Of those drivers who admitted driving while possibly over the legal limit, one in nine (12%) say they have been arrested for driving while intoxicated sometime in their life

While driving under the influence (DUI) and driving while intoxicated (DWI) laws vary by state, according to the legal experts at FindLaw.com, all 50 states currently define drunk driving as having blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher. However, a driver can still be arrested and convicted for a DUI if they have a BAC below 0.08% when there is other evidence of impaired driving.

Here are some legal tips about DUI laws:

Get a ride. Besides putting your life and those of others in danger, some states give police the authority to make a DUI arrest on probable cause if you are intoxicated and in your vehicle with your keys, even if the vehicle is not moving.

California DUI laws involve more than just alcohol. DUI laws are not limited to alcohol use. Most states take into account any substance, including marijuana, prescription drugs and even over-the-counter drugs, such as antihistamines, which may impair a driver's ability to think clearly and safely operate a motor vehicle.

Be careful before refusing a sobriety test. You may refuse acrobatics and gymnastics aka Field Sobriety Tests but you may not refuse to take a chemical test (blood, breath, urine) as nearly every state has a so-called "implied consent" law, and under such laws a refusal can result in suspension of your driver's license for three to 12 months. This is true even if you're eventually found not guilty of the drunk driving charge. Further, if your drunk driving case goes to trial, the prosecutor can tell the jury that you wouldn't take the test, which may lead the jury members to conclude that because you refused you were, in fact, under the influence. In states such as California, juries are instructed that they may infer that you were conscious of your own guilt.

Retain a DUI Defense lawyer. Because defending against a charge of driving under the influence requires an understanding of scientific and medical concepts, it's best to hire an attorney who specializes in DUI law. If you need to find a lawyer, go to http://www.sandiegoduihelp.com, which can help you locate an attorney specializing in DUI / Drunk Driving / DMV law in California.

Careful & cooperate at sobriety checkpoints. Even if you have not consumed any alcohol or drugs, you should cooperate with law enforcement authorities if instructed to pull over at a drunk driving checkpoint, which an increasing number of states conduct during major holiday weekends, such as Thanksgiving and New Year's Eve.

Driving under the influence is a fatal problem as well because 41 percent of total traffic deaths are caused by drunk drivers, and this is a very large number that should not exist at all.

And this is why DUI laws in the US have become extremely strict. For example, the California DUI offense laws have given way to approximately 200,000 DUI arrests every year. The California DUI offense law has enforced strict and stringent measures against people who have found to have a blood alcohol count of 0.08% or more.

California DUI offense laws are so strict that the state leads the nation in DUI arrests. These laws are meant to reduce the number of DUI cases. And victims and survivors of drunk-driving crashes have supported the California DUI offense law. It is crucial to have strict DUI Laws so that drunk drivers are not allowed to put the lives of others at risk

California DUI offense laws include specifics such as blood alcohol content level test, license suspension or revocation, checking of ignition interlocks device in the vehicle, field sobriety test to assess physical and mental alertness, and many others.

First time offenders charged under the DUI law could be sentenced to jail with minimum fine. However second offenses occurring within seven years of the first are dealt with more harsh law. It could be a minimum of ten days of jail and fines up to $10,000 and suspension of driving license for not less than three years. Similarly DUI schooling may also be recommended and this may range from 15 weeks to 18 months. And the state of California can also sale your vehicle or impound it with the proceeds going towards charity.

California DUI offense laws have severe criminal penalties based on the severity of the outcome of DUI related crash.

California DUI offense laws have changed over the years in order to curb the increasing number of deaths and injuries occurring due to DUI related accidents. California DUI offense laws have been argued to be unconstitutional in that by automatically finding drivers guilty, a person loses his or her right to have a trial by jury. However at the same time it has been argued to be ‘legal per se’. It is a very unfortunate fact that DUI accidents take an innocent life every thirty minutes, so it is argued that DUI laws should allow for impartial jury trials.

Based on the California DUI offense law, a person under the influence of alcohol is charged on two counts, a Vehicle Code section 23152(a) count, driving impaired by alcohol and 23152(b), driving above 0.08% blood alcohol content

Statistics have proved that since the enactment of the 0.08% blood alcohol count California DUI offense law, the DUI arrests have decreased by an assenting rate of 45%. And also the number of deaths and injuries has shown a 50 percent decrease. These are positive indications, which prove that to an extent, the imposition of fines and punishments has shown affirmative results.

www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/blog

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Checkpoints v. Roving DUI Patrols: Great California DUI attorney debate

California DUI attorneys report on ineffective checkpoints:

Sonora, Ca -- At a DUI and Drivers License Checkpoint operation set up last night in Sonora, 629 vehicles were screened and no DUI arrests were made.

There were, however, three people cited for not having a valid license. The checkpoint was on Mono Way, just west of Greenly Rd. Lt. Mark Stinson says funding for the program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

This was the Sonora Police Department's final checkpoint during the current grant period. The Department was assisted by the CHP.

California DUI lawyers compare with roving patrols:

The California Highway Patrol arrested dozens of people in the Stockton area on Friday night as part of a mission targeting drunken drivers.

A grant from the Office of Traffic Safety funded the mission, which put 24 additional officers on the street overnight Friday.

They conducted roving DUI patrols in areas where drunken drivers are common, said CHP Officer Adrian Quintero, a spokesman for the Stockton-area unit.

"We just inundate the city and the county looking for where there are likely to be high levels of alcohol impairment," he said.

A total of 57 people were arrested for drunken driving in the 24 hours ending at 8 a.m. Saturday, far more than usual. Most of those were arrested during the DUI mission.

Quintero said the local CHP will, starting in October, be devoting considerable resources to curbing DUIs. www.SanDiegoDUIlawyer.com/blog

Friday, September 19, 2008

http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/articles California DUI cops lie

California DUI police do not always tell the truth! This is a sad realization that happens more than one would think. As California DUI criminal defense attorneys, we see it all the time.

Some examples of police dishonesty that we come across include police lying to suspects during interrogations in order to get them to talk, inaccurate and/or erroneous police reports, etc. http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/Black-and-White-Fever.html

In Los Angeles, the dishonesty of the LAPD has resulted in the dismissal of two high profile criminal cases over the last few months. In one of the cases, a LAPD detective was caught lying after being presented with radio recordings that contradicted his testimony about a stakeout. This forced the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office to dismiss an attempted murder case last month against an individual who had been in custody for 3 years fighting these charges!

What this case shows is that if you believe the California DUI police have been dishonest during the investigation of your California DUI / Drunk Driving case, chances are, you might be right! http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/articles.html

So contact a quality California DUI defense attorney. Try the California DUI Lawyers Association at http://www.california-dui-lawyers.org/. Visit

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Texting while Operating More Dangerous than DUI

California drunk driving criminal defense lawyers know texting is dangerous.

With California lawmakers ready to vote Thursday on an emergency order banning train operators from using cell phones, a new study finds the practice of DWT -- driving while texting -- is a growing danger on the nation's roads.

According to a new survey conducted by Nationwide Mutual Insurance, one in five drivers in a admitted to texting while behind the wheel. A second survey on FindLaw.com, a legal website, found nearly half of drivers age 18 to 24 admitted to sending text messages, instant messages or e-mail messages while driving.

Law enforcement officials said it is nearly impossible to determine how many accidents are caused by texting because few drivers will admit to texting after being in an accident.

Engineers at the University of Massachusetts have used a simulator to study what happens when drivers multi-task -- and found the danger of texting while driving was almost as dangerous as drinking behind the wheel.

"The crash risk when you're texting is in the neighborhood of the crash risk when you've had three to four drinks of alcohol," Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst Professor Donald Fisher said. "Most people think they can get away with typing out some quick phrases while they're driving. But our research shows if you look away from the road for just a few seconds, it nearly triples your risk of crashing."

Only five states -- Alaska, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Jersey and Washington -- have laws specifically prohibiting texting behind the wheel. California is one of 21 other states considering similar legislation.

Michael Peevey, president of the California Public Utilities Commission, is seeking an emergency order banning train operators from using cell phones. The commission has scheduled a vote on the order Thursday.

The collision between the Metrolink train and a Union Pacific freight train killed 25 people and injured 138 people - the deadliest rail disaster in the U.S. in 15 years.

Metrolink has blamed its engineer for not heeding a red light signal designed to prevent such wrecks, and the National Transportation Safety Board is reviewing whether the engineer was text messaging. www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net/articles

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Balance the Budget or work on Ignition Interlock California DUI bill?

California DUI criminal defense attorneys are told by MADD that Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) called on the Senate Public Safety Committee to restore AB 2784 to its original form and reinstate a requirement for anyone convicted of a DUI to use an alcohol ignition interlock.

The Assembly Appropriations Committee weakened the original bill introduced by Assembly Member Mike Feuer (D-Los Angeles) just as new data from the U.S. Department of Transportation shows that California’s families are sharing the road with 310,971 drunk drivers with three or more California Drunk Driving / DUI convictions.

“Drunk driving is a primary threat to the safety and well-being of everyone in California – a threat that legislation requiring interlocks for convicted drunk drivers can significantly reduce,” said MADD National CEO Chuck Hurley. “That’s why the Senate needs to revoke the Assembly’s amendment and ensure that the original bill is approved to keep convicted drunk drivers off California’s roadways.”

MADD is urging the Senate Public Safety Committee to hold a hearing on the merits of requiring all convicted drunk drivers to use an ignition interlock device. Additionally, Californians across the state should voice their strong disappointment in this weakened bill and call on legislators to hold a hearing and support the use of ignition interlocks for all convicted DUI offenders.

“In 2006, drunk drivers killed 1,276 people in California,” said Matthias Mendezona, executive director of MADD California. “Because so many of these drunk driving tragedies are caused by those who have prior convictions, we must pass strong legislation to require alcohol ignition interlocks for everyone convicted of drunk driving.”

Mandatory ignition interlock devices for convicted offenders are scientifically proven to deter future California DUI / drunk driving offenses. Studies show that interlock devices are 65 percent effective in reducing recidivism while installed on the vehicle. Passage of AB 2784 as originally introduced will save hundreds of lives and prevent thousands of injuries.

Alcohol ignition interlocks, paid for by the convicted drunk driver, are a breath test device linked to a vehicle’s ignition system.
www.SanDiegoDUIhelp.com/duiblog

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

California DUI roadblock September 19

California DUI defense attorneys report the Rocklin Police Department will be conducting a sobriety and driver’s license checkpoint on Friday, September 19, 2008 at 8 p.m. in the city of Rocklin.

The goal of the checkpoint is to raise the level of public awareness and inform citizens about the efforts being made to identify and apprehend impaired drivers. Sobriety checkpoints tend to reduce the number of drinking drivers on the road and do not necessarily produce a dramatic increase in DUI arrests. A major benefit of the checkpoint is the educational and deterrent influence on the motoring public, according to California DUI defense lawyers.

Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, per California DUI defense attorneys.

www.SanDiegoDUIlawyer.com/blog

Monday, September 15, 2008

California DMV FAQ's by California drunk driving defense lawyer

California DMV FAQ's by California drunk driving defense lawyer
http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net

California DMV / DUI Hearing

The California DUI / DMV hearing for a possible license suspension is like a mini-DUI trial without a jury, but with much different San Diego California DMV rules, San Diego California DMV laws and San Diego California DMV procedures. The San Diego California DUI / DMV hearing is presided over by a Driver Safety Officer (DMV hearing officer) rather than a real judge, an employee of the DMV not trained in law who acts as both prosecutor and judge. As unfair as it is, she or he can legally object to your evidence, rule on her or his own objection, dually engage your San Diego California DUI / DMV lawyer, and admit or not admit either party's evidence.

The San Diego California Driver Safety Officer offers evidence in the form of documents and/or witnesses. The Driver Safety Officer offers the San Diego drunk driving / DUI police report, DMV records, San Diego DUI alcohol reports and the important San Diego DUI officer's sworn statement entitled a "DS 367." With no Fifth Amendment right at the hearing, your San Diego DUI / DMV attorney usually will not want you to be present at the hearing since the Driver Safety Officer can call you as a witness and force you to testify against yourself if you ill-advisedly appear.

The San Diego DMV Driver Safety Officer's decision will usually be mailed a few days or even weeks after the hearing. A San Diego DMV / DMV suspension can be set aside or sustained. If the San Diego DMV suspension is sustained, the decision can be appealed to the DMV in Sacramento and/or to the San Diego Superior court by filing a San Diego DMV petition for writ of mandamus.

A San Diego California DUI lawyer's defenses at an APS hearing are specialized and technical, more so than in criminal court. Frequent San Diego DUI / DMV proof problems - as well as legal, procedural and bureaucratic obstacles - are possible grounds for setting aside the suspension.

Because of the peculiar nature of San Diego California DUI / DMV hearings and the absence of an independent San Diego California DUI judge to offer some protection, you are strongly advised not to try to represent yourself. Because these are not San Diego DUI criminal proceedings, San Diego County public defenders are unavailable.

Your San Diego California DUI / DMV attorney has just 10 CALENDAR DAYS after the DUI arrest to call the San Diego DMV Driver Safety Office to timely demand a hearing. You waive your right to a hearing after the 10 day deadline is up.

If your San Diego California DUI / DMV attorney has not been retained within 10 days of the arrest, you should contact the local Driver's Safety Office yourself, request a 5 day extension so you can get a San Diego DUI / DMV Attorney Specialist.

Alternatively, if your request for an extension is denied by the San Diego DMV supervisor, request an In-person hearing, the Discovery (evidence), a Stay (stop) of the Suspension, and the Name of the Driver Safety Officer.

Please ask for the name of the person you speak with. Please do not discuss the reasons why you are contesting the suspension. The San Diego California Driver Safety Office is located at 9174 Sky Park Avenue, Suite 200, San Diego (858/627-3901 or fax 858/627-3925).

The San Diego California DMV may not be able to schedule a hearing before your 30-day temporary license expires. Your San Diego DUI / DMV lawyer will request a Notice of Stay of the 30-day temporary license until a San Diego DMV hearing is provided and a San Diego DMV decision is actually rendered.

Contact a San Diego California DUI Lawyer who can help with DMV

San Diego California DUI Lawyer

San Diego California DUI

California DUI Attorney

1-800-The-Law-DUI

California's DUI Law Center

Sunday, September 14, 2008

California DUI Q. Why can't college kids buy beer?!

California DUI defense lawyers are often approached by persons under 21 who are arrested for a California drunk driving. They often want to take advantage of the California dui laws available to those who are 21 and over. However, they cannot but they should.

At age 18, an American can enlist in the military, vote, sign a contract, get married, have an operation - and in California, a 14-year-old can have an abortion without telling her parents - but cannot legally buy a beer.

It makes no sense. We believe in rights except for those of college kids, even if they are serving in the military.

Enter the Amethyst Initiative, pushed by former Middlebury College President John McCardell and signed by more than 100 college presidents, which is pushing for Washington "to reopen public debate over the drinking age." According to McCardell, it is time for Washington to reconsider a 1984 measure, signed by President Ronald Reagan, that withheld 10 percent of highway funds from states that had a legal drinking age lower than 21.

The reason for the Amethyst Project - named for a gemstone believed to be "an antidote to the negative effects of intoxication" - is simple. Many college officials do not believe that the 21-year-old drinking age works. They believe that most students break the law. Worse, McCardell argues, they believe that the age fosters a "culture of dangerous, clandestine binge-drinking."

Does the law work? How many kids break it? More than half of 18- to 20-year-olds, according to the Department of Health and Human Services' latest survey on drug and alcohol use, reported that they drank alcohol in the last month alone, despite legal prohibitions. College students were more likely to drink than their same-age peers not attending college. So apparently it doesn't work. I submit that there is something wrong - something that breeds contempt - with a law that most people break.

The primary opposition to the initiative comes from Mothers Against Drunk Driving. MADD argues that if the drinking age is lowered, more high school students will drink. That may well be true. Although it does seem that teens have little trouble finding alcohol - or illegal drugs - as it is. The same national study found that close to 30 percent of 16- and 17-year-olds drank alcohol in the past month, while 13 percent smoked marijuana.

MADD also argues that the 21-year-old drinking age saves lives. Amethyst Initiative's McCardell argues that there was no big dip in fatalities when the drinking age was raised. Instead, there has been a small steady decline in drunken-driving fatalities over the years as MADD's work rightly has stigmatized drunken driving - the term "designated driver" came into use in the 1980s - and improved car safety has saved lives as well.

MADD Chief Executive Officer Chuck Hurley notes that several studies have found that the 21-year-old drinking age saves lives. As the Associated Press reported, a survey of research from the United States and other countries by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded that the 21-year-old drinking age has preserved lives.

By that account, then, raising the drinking age to 25 or 30 or 40 would save lives, too. But there is this thing called freedom. And freedom should apply to men and women old enough for military service, old enough to get married and old enough to have had an abortion (four years before).

There is something nasty in the way MADD takes on the critics. "Parents should think twice before sending their teens to these colleges or any others that have waved the white flag on underage and binge-drinking policies," MADD President Laura Dean-Mooney warns. This is MADD's way of trying to stifle debate.

MADD execs also have charged that university presidents want to rethink the drinking age to make their lives easier - as if they don't care about students - or to protect against legal liability. Now maybe the argument that lowering the age will reduce binge drinking is just plain wrong, but it also is false to argue that the 21-year-old limit has stopped teen drinking.

www.SanDiegoDUIlawyer.com/blog

Saturday, September 13, 2008

California DUI / Drunk Driving Officer opinion of under the infuence

California DUI attorneys are often asked how can a California DUI police officer claim that a driver is under the influence? www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net/articles

In a California DUI / Drunk Driving investigation in California, the California DUI / Drunk Driving police officer usually claims that the DUI suspect “performed poorly” or “failed” California DUI / Drunk Driving field sobriety tests and the handheld California DUI / Drunk Driving breath test often claims that the driver’s blood alcohol level was above the legal limit.

Based on this, the California DUI / Drunk Driving officer would “form an opinion” that the driver is under the influence or the driver’s ability to drive a motor vehicle safely is impaired. After this, the California DUI / Drunk Driving officer would arrest the driver and take him/her to the police station (or hospital) for a California DUI / Drunk Driving chemical test.

The driver suspected for California DUI / Drunk Driving would choose between a breath test and a blood test. California has an “Implied Consent Law” that says that a person who is arrested lawfully for California DUI / Drunk Driving should submit to one of these tests.

A California DUI / Drunk Driving refusal could subject the California DUI / Drunk Driving suspect to stiffer California DUI / Drunk Driving court penalties and possibly a one-year (or longer) driver’s license suspension.

If the driver chooses a California DUI / Drunk Driving blood test, the blood sample would be forwarded to a crime lab for analysis.

If he/she chooses a California DUI / Drunk Driving breath test, the officer would see the blood alcohol content reading immediately after the driver blows twice into the California DUI / Drunk Driving breath test machine.

The California DUI / Drunk Driving officer sometimes tells the DUI suspect of the result, according to California DUI / Drunk Driving lawyers.

Friday, September 12, 2008

What you must do at DMV within 10 days of being arrested for a California DUI

What you must do within 10 days of being arrested for a California DUI




10. If you need to save your driver's license or privileges, your California DUI attorney has only ten (10) calendar days to contact DMV!



Do not schedule yourself. If you contact DMV to schedule a date conflicting with your California DUI attorney's calendar, DMV will not reschedule and you may not get the California DUI lawyer of your choice. There is no rush as long as your California DUI defense lawyer contacts DMV by the 10th day from your California DUI arrest.



9. The ten (10) day time limit is computed from the Issue date of the SUSPENSION/REVOCATION ORDER AND TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE. If time is running out or you are late, contact a California DUI attorney ASAP.



8. This ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE SUSPENSION/REVOCATION ORDER AND TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE is the California DMV paper which you should have received.



7. Even if you did not receive this DMV paper, the California DMV will probably take action against your driving privileges.



6. Even if you have a license from another state, and even if the California DUI officer did not take your license, that state may also take action against your driving privileges.



5. This TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE ENDORSEMENT is valid for only thirty (30) days from the issue date.



If a DMV hearing is requested within ten (10) days, your DMV TEMPORARY will be extended & there will be a stay (delay) of any suspension until the outcome of your DMV hearing is determined.



4. Do not confuse this initial 30 day TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE with your court date!

The DMV and criminal proceedings are separate and independent. The outcome of one almost never affects the other. Sometimes the officer or the DMV paper confuses or misleads you to believe that the TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE is good "until the court date". If there are approximately thirty (30) days from your arrest date to your court date, this may just be a dangerous coincidence. There usually are months before your DMV hearing takes place.



3. There are three (3) issues at the hearing if you completed a California DUI chemical test. (See reverse side of DMV paper.)



Issues are whether the California DUI officer had probable cause to stop or contact you or whether the California Drunk Driving chemical test evidence is beatable.



2. The DMV has the burden of proof to prevail on all three (3) issues. If DMV meets the burden of proof on two (2) issues, you win!



1. All a California DUI - DMV attorney has to do is knock out one (1) DMV issue to save your license & you avoid any reissue fee and/or Proof of Insurance SR-22 filing!






DMV field offices are open 8:00 am - noon on these Saturdays only:
01/19/2008 02/16/2008 03/15/2008
04/19/2008 05/17/2008 06/21/2008
07/19/2008 08/16/2008 09/20/2008
10/18/2008 11/15/2008 12/20/2008

http://www.dmv.ca.gov/fo/regions/sandiego.htm

Visit below sites to contact a California DUI Lawyer:

San Diego DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego DUI Help


1-800-The-Law-DUI

Thursday, September 11, 2008

How expensive a California drunk driving situation could get

California DUI Attorneys at www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net/penalties know how expensive a California drunk driving situation could be.

A California DUI - driving-under-the-influence conviction is a financial wrecking ball. A typical DUI costs about $10,000 by the time you pay bail, fines, fees and insurance, even if you didn't hit anything or hurt anybody.

The California DUI penalties are intended to be discouraging. Alcohol played a role in nearly 40% of U.S. automobile fatalities in 2005. That's 16,885 deaths, a figure nearly unchanged over the past decade, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

But states are cracking down. The last of the 50 states have lowered their thresholds for DUI to 0.08% blood-alcohol content. Police arrested 1.37 million people last year for driving under alcohol's grip, about one in every 140 licensed drivers, the FBI says.

But forget the humiliation and hassle for now. Forget the toll on lives. Just look at what a California DUI does to your wallet:

Bail. You'll have to shell out bail to get released after your arrest. Cost: $150-$2,500 or more.

(Costs shown in this article are for first-time California DUI offenders. Costs and penalties can be more severe if you're a repeat offender or your blood-alcohol content is above 0.15%.)
Towing. When you're arrested, your car gets towed. In some places, retrieving it costs only $100 or so. But Chicago, sensing a moneymaking opportunity, ensures it really hurts: The city charges about $1,200 for the first 24 hours and $50 for each additional day of storage, say Chicago DUI defense attorneys. If you can't afford to get your car after 30 days, the city auctions it and then comes after you with a civil judgment for the impoundment bill, if the car's sale didn't cover the fees. Some cities around Chicago are doing the same, Wallin says. Cost: $100-$1,200.

Insurance. One of the biggest hits a California DUI - drunken driver takes is in his insurance premiums.

"If you get a DUI conviction, it will likely affect your insurance rates for (at least) the next three to five years," says Carole Walker, the executive director of the Rocky Mountain Insurance Information Association.

How much? "They could double, triple, even quadruple," Walker says. Some companies such as State Farm Insurance will move you to a portion of the company that handles higher-risk policies.

But "many insurance companies will drop you even upon arrest, regardless of conviction," say other DUI attorneys. And if your policy isn't renewed, you'll have to try to find insurance someplace else or see whether your state has an assigned-risk pool for insurance. Either way, you'll pay for it. For example: Illinois estimates that the high-risk insurance costs an additional $1,500 a year for three years, on average.

The roadside embarrassment is just the start. Watch out for the hidden cost of a traffic ticket. Don't pay the price if you don't have to. Click here to play the video.


Why three years? Most insurance companies look at records for at least three years and sometimes for five years, Walker says. To begin rebuilding your reputation in an insurer's eyes, you have to keep your nose completely clean -- no speeding tickets or other traffic citations.

But the financial impact of that California DUI doesn't end after three years: You'll likely have to go as many as five more years, incident-free, to get back to the "preferred" status with the lowest premiums that you perhaps once enjoyed. In short, "it can be up to eight years afterward" that the California DUI can affect you, Walker says. Ouch. Cost: $4,500 or more.

Legal fees. Attorneys might charge a low amount to enter a quick plea. But with so much at stake, many people accused of California DUI fight the charge. That's when things start to add up.

Attorneys who specialize in DUI defense says legal representation can cost anywhere from $2,500 and up, depending on the rigor and complexity of the defense. But that's not the only fee. A vigorous defense is complex. There may be a need for expert witnesses who can testify about the accuracy, or lack thereof, which could easily cost over $1,000. Usually, attorneys say, fees are $7,500 or more with some lawyers.

Fines. Fines and court fees for breaking the law range from state to state, from a minimum of $300 in Colorado and $685 in Washington to as much as $3,000 in California. "The fines have gone up dramatically over the last few years in Illinois," says Wallin. "A few years ago in Chicago, the typical DUI fine was about $300 on the first offense. And now it's $900 to $1,200." Cost: $300-$3,000.

Alcohol evaluation. An evaluation is usually required of anyone who is sentenced by the court for drunken driving. Cost: $181 in Colorado, for example.

Alcohol education and treatment. If you're convicted, you usually have to undergo an education or treatment program, especially if you want to get your license again. Treatment can vary hugely in scope and extent. Cost: $400-$2,000 for basic treatment.

License reinstatement fees. Once a driver has shown, by completing courses and treatment, that he deserves his license back, the state charges him for the reissue. Cost: $60-$250.

Additional fees. Colorado, for example, will slap you with myriad other fees:

$10 jail filing fee.

$78 Victim Assistance Fund payment.

$25 Victim Compensation Fund payment.

$90 for the Law Enforcement Assistance Fund.

$15 Brain Injury surcharge.

$25 Victim Impact Panel assessment.

If you had been particularly drunk, a judge might order that an ignition lock be placed on your car to test your breath and prevent your car from starting if you're intoxicated. In Tennessee, for example, this costs $65-$70 a month. Cost: $308 and up.

The unexpected and sometimes unquantifiable costs
Finally, there are several other costs that you need to remember:

Life-insurance-premium increases. With a DUI arrest or conviction, you could see an increase in your life-insurance bills because insurers may ask if your license has ever been suspended.

Lost time = lost money. People who've gotten DUIs report missing a lot of work (and therefore losing a lot of income) dealing with their mistake, as a result of court dates, community service and sometimes a jail sentence. That doesn't even count the lost free time.

Lose the license? Lose the job. For many people who need to drive to and from their jobs -- much less those who drive for their jobs -- losing a license can be devastating. And here's a shocker: In several states, including Washington, your license may be suspended for 90 days simply upon your arrest for DUI, regardless of whether you end up being convicted. If you're convicted, your license can be revoked for a year, or longer in other states, until you complete all the court's requirements and pay all fines.

No drunks in the cockpit or the ER. If you're a doctor, stockbroker, airline pilot, lawyer or nurse, a DUI conviction could affect the status of your professional license, California DUI defense lawyers say.

It's not good for the résumé. A DUI lingers on your criminal record for employers to see if they do a background check, harming your future job prospects. In Washington state, a DUI conviction also stays on your driving record for 14 years, and an employer can ask for and receive that information.

Adding it up
So in the end, how much does a DUI cost?

The STOP-DWI Office in Erie County, N.Y., estimates that a drunken-driving conviction there costs $9,500 -- if no one is injured and there's no accident. Colorado estimates about the same thing.

Illinois' secretary of state pegs the amount closer to $10,600 but says the figure would be nearly $15,000, on average, if people counted the lost income from all the hassles.

Any way you slice it, it's a pricey mistake.

But the biggest thing that's lost isn't money, California DUI defense lawyers say. The biggest thing here is the stigma that you get. Everybody looks at you and says, He's the drunk driver. And the stigma doesn't have a financial cost. But the stigma does have both a social cost and an employment cost.

The deadliest states for DUI Location % Fatalities DUI-related Location % Fatalities DUI-related
Washington, D.C.
54.17%
Maryland
38.27%

Hawaii
50.71%
Wyoming
38.24%

Rhode Island
49.43%
Ohio
38.17%

Montana
49.40%
Alabama
37.40%

Delaware
49.25%
Michigan
37.29%

Alaska
48.61%
Nevada
37.24%

North Dakota
47.15%
New York
36.67%

Washington
45.44%
Virginia
36.64%

Wisconsin
45.28%
Tennessee
36.54%

Texas
44.78%
Oregon
36.27%

Connecticut
43.80%
New Hampshire
36.14%

South Dakota
43.01%
Minnesota
35.96%

Illinois
42.62%
Arkansas
35.96%

South Carolina
42.45%
North Carolina
35.79%

Arizona
41.80%
Oklahoma
35.29%

Florida
41.52%
Kansas
35.28%

Louisiana
41.26%
New Jersey
35.16%

Missouri
40.97%
Maine
34.91%

Colorado
40.26%
Indiana
34.12%

Mississippi
39.85%
West Virginia
33.69%

Vermont
39.73%
Nebraska
32.97%

California
39.71%
Idaho
32.36%

Pennsylvania
39.36%
Kentucky
31.78%

U.S. average
38.87%
Georgia
31.52%

New Mexico
38.73%
Iowa
26.22%

Massachusetts
38.69%
Utah
13.12%

California DUI / Drunk Driving Saturation Patrol update

California DUI criminal defense lawyers are told that Labor Day weekend, the Pasadena Police Department conducted its sixth DUI saturation enforcement detail of 2008. www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/articles

The California DUI / Drunk Driving operation ran from 7 p.m. to 3 a.m. Aug 29, a Friday. Incidentally, a DUI saturation enforcement detail is different from a DUI checkpoint. Unlike California DUI / Drunk Driving checkpoints, there is no predetermined location where cops screen all drivers passing through a particular location. Instead, according to Lt. Phulante Riddle, California DUI / Drunk Driving saturation details involve officers — this time 14 — patrolling areas with high numbers of restaurants and bars, including Old Pasadena, South Lake Avenue, the east end of Colorado Boulevard and the edges of San Gabriel. According to Riddle, 11 DUI arrests were made, with all 11 perps found to have a blood alcohol content (BAC) above the legal limit of .08.

Maybe celebrating the fact that we caught nearly a dozen California DUI drunk drivers is a little deranged, but still, no one was injured, or worse, killed, and I’m all about celebrating the little victories.

On any given Friday before a holiday weekend probably more than 11 California DUI / Drunk Driving people in Pasadena foolishly put the pedal to the metal in their cars. This particular Friday was undoubtedly no exception.

Even if California DUI / Drunk Driving police enforcement isn’t catching all of the cockeyed drivers, they are catching some. And that deserves recognition, especially when you consider that this California DUI / Drunk Driving saturation detail came at a relatively low cost to taxpayers, yet may have helped save some of their lives. Simple math (which is the only kind I’m capable of grasping) will prove my point.

According to Riddle, the total cost of staging this California DUI / Drunk Driving action was roughly $10,000 — money acquired from a grant awarded to the Pasadena Police Department by the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Riddle says the minimum financial consequences one can expect when convicted of California DUI / Drunk Driving driving under the influence come to $13,500. That -figure includes, among other things, the minimum fine of $486, vehicle towing and storage, running another $187, and alcohol education courses, which cost roughly $500. Then there are the other fines and penalties, including attorney fees (which can vary immensely), booking and photographing fees, DMV reissuing charges, not to mention the long-term penalties (such as an increase in auto insurance, which may cost more than $8,000 over a 10-year period). The potential loss of a job would also probably be devastating.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

California DUI checkpoint September 12

California DUI defense attorneys report On Friday evening, September 12,
The California Highway Patrol will hold a checkpoint in San Francisco on Friday to target drunken and unlicensed drivers.

The checkpoint will be held from 10:30 p.m. Friday to 12:30 a.m. Saturday at an undisclosed location. The CHP plans to check all vehicles.

Also on friday, the Roseville Police Department will conduct a sobriety and driver's license checkpoint at an undisclosed location with a significant history of DUI-related traffic collisions and DUI arrests. California DUI Officers will screen all drivers passing through the California DUI checkpoint, and will arrest any drivers suspected of being impaired by alcohol or other drugs. Those without a valid driver's license will be cited, and their vehicles may be impounded.

The Roseville Police Department conducts California DUI sobriety and driver's license checkpoints regularly to take dangerous drivers off the road, and to raise the awareness of all motorists about the serious consequences of drinking and driving, California DUI lawyers are told.

Funding for Roseville's California DUI sobriety checkpoints is provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. www.SanDiegoDUIlawyer.com/blog

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

California DUI driver hits school bus and battles cops

California DUI defense lawyers report that four California Highway Patrol officers suffered minor injuries while arresting a California DUI man who crashed into a school bus at Trout Gulch Road and Soquel Drive yesterday morning.

The bus was on Soquel Drive at the intersection of Trout Gulch headed toward Santa Cruz at 7:05 a.m. when the driver, Michael Murphy, 57, of Santa Cruz allegedly let his Toyota 4Runner roll backward into the front of the bus, according to California DUI attorneys.

The bus had no students on it at the time, according to California DUI criminal lawyers.

Murphy was allegedly combative and resisted arrest causing three CHP officers to suffer minor back injuries while trying to detain him, and a fourth officer was kicked, California DUI defense attorneys said.

Murphy was arrested on suspicion of California Drunk Driving/ DUI and resisting arrest. The Pajaro Valley Unified School Board bus was drivable and able to continue its morning route.

Murphy told officers he had been drinking since 3:30 am. per California DUI lawyers. www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/survey

Sunday, September 7, 2008

California DUI criminal defense lawyer - Costa Mesa & Fresno arrest news

California DUI criminal defense lawyers are told 4 were arrested at Fresno sobriety checkpoint.

Four drivers were arrested Friday night at a sobriety and driver's-license checkpoint at Shaw and Maple avenues in front of California State University, Fresno, California DUI criminal defense lawyers reported.

The DUI operation on the westbound traffic lanes of Shaw also resulted in 40 vehicles being impounded, California DUI criminal defense attorneys said.

The Costa Mesa Police Department conducted a sobriety checkpoint on September 04, 2008, at 17th Street and Westminster Avenue. Funding for this program is provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety through the Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency and is part of a National enforcement campaign.

During the hours of operation, 1,568 vehicles drove through the checkpoint, 326 were stopped, and 20 drivers were screened. Police conducted 7 DUI investigations with no arrests for driving under the influence. However, 2 drivers were cited for no license and 2 drivers were cited for driving on a suspended license. A total of 21 citations were issued for miscellaneous vehicle code violations and 4 vehicles were impounded.

The Costa Mesa Police Department will be teaming up with Mothers Against Drunk Driving (M.A.D.D.) for the checkpoint. During the checkpoint, there will also be an increased number of officers patrolling adjacent streets in an effort to stop impaired drivers from avoiding the checkpoint.

Please remember to make the right choice and avoid driving after drinking.

http://www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net/articles

Saturday, September 6, 2008

CHP ENCOURAGES RAIDERS GAME SPECTATORS TO NOT DRINK AND DRIVE

California dui criminal defense lawyers are told CHP ENCOURAGES RAIDERS GAME SPECTATORS TO NOT DRINK AND DRIVE

The California Highway Patrol is warning Bay Area football fans who plan to attend the Oakland Raiders game Monday night in Oakland to drive carefully to and from and stadium.

The game against the Denver Broncos, scheduled to begin at 7:15 p.m., is expected to bring in many possible California dui spectators, according to California dui lawyers.

In addition to those attending the game, residents who are hosting or traveling to football parties are encouraged to drive safely and avoid California dui - driving under the influence.

"The real MVP on game day is the designated driver," CHP Golden Gate Division Chief Theresa Becher said in a prepared statement. "It's a plain and simple fact, alcohol affects your coordination."

A first-time California dui conviction can cost at least $10,000 in fines, penalties, restitution, legal fees and increased insurance costs.

Public transportation is strongly recommended by the CHP in lieu of driving, per California dui attorneys at www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net/about.

Friday, September 5, 2008

California DUI arrests up

California DUI criminal defense lawyers are told DUI arrests up 12 percent over Labor Day weekend in certain areas.

California DUI Police officers, CHP officers and sheriff's deputies made 104 California DUI arrests of drivers suspected of driving under the influence in Ventura County during the fourday Labor Day weekend California DUI crackdown that ended at midnight Monday.

This is 12 percent above last year's total of 88 California DUI arrests during the same long weekend and down from 120 California DUI / drunk driving arreests during this year's Memorial Day weekend.

California DUI suspects killed no one during these times.

The multijurisdictional police crackdown on impaired driving will take to the streets again starting Dec. 12 for a 19-day winter holiday crackdown, according to California DUI lawyers.

The California Office of Traffic Safety funds the effort through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said Senior Officer Humberto Jimenez of the Oxnard Police Department, per California DUI attorneys. www.sandiegodui.com

Thursday, September 4, 2008

traffic deaths dropped dramatically across the state in response to a California dui police crackdown on drunk drivers

At www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net, California dui criminal defense attorneys are told traffic deaths dropped dramatically across the state in response to a police crackdown on drunken drivers on the last long weekend of the summer. "Arrests are up a little bit, but deaths are way down for the Labor Day weekend," said California Highway Patrol Officer Hugo Mendoza. "It seems like people are paying attention to what we've been saying."

From 6 p.m. Friday to Monday evening, there were two reported fatalities in the Bay Area, the same as last year. But statewide figures show that as of 6 a.m. Monday, there had been 23 traffic deaths over the weekend, down from 42 last year.

Those figures also show just how important seat belts can be in an accident, Mendoza said. Of the 19 people who died in traffic accidents of CHP-patrolled roads this weekend, three were on motorcycles and 16 were in cars.

Nine of those 16 people killed weren't wearing seat belts.

"It's surprising, because when we go out looking, it's hard to find people who aren't wearing seat belts," he said. "But some of those people who weren't wearing them could be alive today if they had buckled up."

Not everyone has gotten the word to take it easy at the end-of-summer parties. As of 6 a.m. Monday, CHP officers had arrested 1,416 people across the state for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, only a few more than the number for the same period last year, 1,406. In the Bay Area, the 377 arrests are down some from 2007. Final weekend arrest numbers are expected today.

There are 125 Bay Area law enforcement agencies putting on a full-court-press against drunken drivers in the regional Avoid DUI Campaign this weekend.

The push, which involves putting extra officers on the streets and highways and running various street check points for impaired drivers, continued until midnight.

www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/survey

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

California attorney for dui

California attorney DUI Specialist Rick Mueller is a premier San Diego California Drunk Driving, DUI & DMV Defense attorney with over twenty-four years of experience.




Known as the California attorney's "DMV Guru," Rick Mueller dedicates all of his law practice to aggressively defending those accused of driving under the influence of alcohol. http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/




California attorney Drunk Driving Defense Survey is used to find out your best strategy and to protect your driving privileges in California.
http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/survey.html









California attorneys

San Diego California attorney DUI Lawyer


San Diego California attorney DUI


California DUI Attorney

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

California DUI checkpoint thursday

California DUI defense lawyers report Costa Mesa police will have a DUI checkpoint from 6 p.m. to midnight Thursday, looking for drivers under the influence and people driving without a valid license.

The California DUI checkpoint is scheduled to be at eastbound 17th Street and Westminster Avenue.

Police say California DUI driving under the influence is the nation’s most frequently committed violent crime, killing someone every 30 minutes. This year alone, more than 600 drivers have been arrested for driving under the influence in Costa Mesa.

The California DUI checkpoint is meant to educate the public about the dangers of driving impaired or without a valid license, California DUI attorneys are told. Costa Mesa police also work with Mothers Against Drunk Driving and the Orange County Health Care Agency to create California DUI task forces to educate drivers and businesses serving alcohol.

The California DUI checkpoint is one of the last Costa Mesa police will be conducting with funding from a California Office of Traffic Safety grant, according to California DUI lawyers. www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/blog

Monday, September 1, 2008

CHP REPORTS MAXIMUM ENFORCEMENT DUI STATS for CALIFORNIA

California dui criminal defense lawyers at www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net report CHP REPORTS MAXIMUM ENFORCEMENT DUI STATS

The California Highway Patrol reported an increase in DUI arrests and a "dramatic" decrease in traffic deaths in the state during the first night of the Labor Day weekend.

CHP officers arrested 483 drivers for driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol during the period from 6 p.m. Friday and 6 a.m. Saturday. That number is up from 2007, when 406 drivers were arrested for DUI during the first night of the Labor Day holiday weekend.

Statewide traffic deaths have decreased, according to the CHP. Three people were killed in traffic-related incidents this year between 6 p.m. Friday and 6 a.m. Saturday, down compared to the nine that were killed during the same period last year.

During the 6 p.m. Friday to 6 a.m. Saturday period in the Bay Area, 70 drivers have been arrested for DUI and there have been no traffic deaths reported.