Saturday, February 28, 2009

Boston Celtic arrested for California DUI - drunk driving

California DUI defense lawyers and California drunk driving criminal attorneys at http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/articles.html report Boston Celtics guard Gabe Pruitt apologized Thursday after he was stopped on a Hollywood street and arrested for investigation of California DUI - misdemeanor drunk driving.

Former College Basketball Star Gabe Pruitt was pulled over around 3 a.m., hours after playing just about five minutes in the Celtics' 93-91 loss to the Los Angeles Clippers. He allegedly failed a California DUI acrobatics & gymnastics test.

He was released at 8:30 a.m. on $5,000 bail, California DUI attorneys believe.

Pruitt is from the Los Angeles area and played college basketball for Southern California.

"I sincerely apologize for my actions which have caused unnecessary embarrassment to my family, my team, and the Celtics organization," the 22-year-old Pruitt said in a statement issued by the team. "I used poor judgment and I am really disappointed in myself."

"I made a mistake and I have learned a valuable lesson," he said.

Pruitt was detained for allegedly stopping at a green light and because his Mercedes S550 had dark tinted windows that are allegedly illegal in California, California DUI lawyers were told.

California DUI Lawyer Rick Mueller, a California DUI / Drunk Driving / DWI Defense Attorney handling San Diego California DUI & DMV cases, shows how a California DUI Lawyer will help you.
California DUI Lawyer Rick Mueller is a premier California Drunk Driving, DUI & DMV Defense attorney with over 25 years of experience. Known as a California DUI - "DMV Guru," Rick Mueller dedicates 100% of his law practice to aggressively defending those accused of driving under the influence of alcohol. He has successfully saved the driving privileges of many clients in the past year alone. Complete the important Free California DUI - Drunk Driving Defense Survey to find out your best strategy and to protect your driving privileges in California.
California DUI Criminal Defense Lawyer list:

California DUI Lawyer


California DUI


California DUI Attorney


California DUI Help

Friday, February 27, 2009

District Attorney's Son enters Not Guilty Plea to California DUI charges allegedly resulting in drunk driving death

California DUI criminal defense attorneys and California drunk driving criminal defense lawyers at http://www.sandiegodui.com/penalty.html are told it has been almost two weeks since 25-year-old Vanessa King was in a car wreck that killed her friend Alexander Ruiz, but the grim reminders of that terrible day remain.

Case in point: Her arm's still in a sling from wounds suffered during that crash.

King and members of Ruiz's family were among those who watched in court Thursday as 18-year-old Dylan Morse entered his plea on charges of causing that crash: not guilty.

California Highway Patrol investigators believe Morse was drunk the night his 1998 Volvo broadsided a 1988 Honda driven by Ruiz. Ruiz was killed in the Feb. 14 crash, while his passenger, King, suffered a broken arm and other injuries.

Ryne Spitzer, the 19-year-old Sonoma State University student who was the passenger in Morse's car, is in fair condition at Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, according to Katy Hillenmeyer, a spokeswoman for the hospital.

Wearing a somber frown, Morse, the son of Merced County District Attorney Larry Morse II, stood silently in court Thursday as his attorney, Chris Andrian, entered the plea.

During the hearing, Andrian had asked Judge Elliot Lee Daum for additional time to enter a plea, saying that he wanted to review more evidence in the case. Daum denied Andrian's request, saying that Morse must enter his plea.

Andrian said he still has to review a recorded interview between Morse and California Highway Patrol investigators, conducted after the crash.

"This is a very painful situation," Andrian said. "And it's going to take some time."

King and Ruiz's father, Michael Ruiz, left quietly after the hearing and declined comment.

Cindy Morse, the defendant's mother, sat in the audience with Jeff Leis, pastor of Yosemite Church in Merced. She said her son remains "devastated" about the collision, adding that she hopes the case will be resolved "as early as possible," particularly for the sake of the victims' families. "There's a lot of healing that needs to go on for everyone," she said.

Leis said his son, 19-year-old Kyle, has also been deeply affected by the tragedy. Kyle shared a dorm room with Spitzer at Sonoma State.

"He's at the hospital praying every day," Leis said.

Larry Morse wasn't in court Thursday. Over the phone, he said his thoughts continue to be with the victims and their families.

"As nightmarish as this has been for us, we are aware that this has been incalculably worse for the Spitzer and Ruiz families," Morse said. He added that "(Dylan), as well as we, will accept whatever consequences come his way."

CHP investigators reported that the collision happened at 2:20 a.m. at the intersection of Stony Point Road and Highway 116 near Cotati.

Dylan Morse was driving southbound on Stony Point Road and passed through a red light, the CHP reported. He collided with Ruiz's car, according to the CHP, and the impact sent both cars into a nearby field.

Ruiz, an Oakland resident, was pronounced dead at the scene. His passenger, King, suffered facial lacerations, a broken arm and a broken collar bone.

Spitzer, the passenger in Dylan Morse's car, was injured with major head trauma. Morse wasn't injured.

Dylan Morse is charged with felony vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, driving under the influence and causing bodily injury to another person and causing bodily injury while driving with a blood alcohol concentration at or above 0.08 percent. He's also being charged on suspicion of having a fake driver's license and being a minor with alcohol in his car, which are misdemeanors.

He faces up to 15 years in prison, if convicted of the charges. He remains at the Sonoma County Jail in lieu of $180,000 bail.

Dylan Morse's next court appearance is scheduled for March 6.





A premier San Diego DUI attorney will be one with over 24 years of experience and expertise in San Diego California drunk driving cases. Excellent San Diego court outcomes and satisfied clients will also be illustrative of the talent of your San Diego DUI / drunk driving criminal attorney.



San Diego DUI law firms provide free initial consultation to learn more about your case. To find the best San Diego DUI criminal defense lawyer
You can read more -Why use San Diego County's Specialist in DUI and DMV Law http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/why.html .


Or try a Free California DUI Evaluation at http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/survey.html .





San Diego California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar in Rancho Mirage, California: http://www.cacj.org/Events/forms/DUI%20Brochure%20Final.pdf . The California criminal defense lawyers who attended informed the President of the California DUI Lawyers Association that San Diego California DUI criminal defense attorney Rick Mueller was excellent. Rick has been asked to speak again -.

What you must do within 10 days of being arrested



10. If you need to save your driver's license or privileges, your attorney has only ten (10) calendar days to contact DMV!


Do not schedule yourself. If you contact DMV to schedule a date conflicting with your attorney's calendar, DMV will not reschedule and you may not get the attorney of your choice. There is no rush as long as your attorney contacts DMV by the 10th day from your arrest.


9. The ten (10) day time limit is computed from the Issue date of the SUSPENSION/REVOCATION ORDER AND TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE. If time is running out or you are late, contact an attorney ASAP.


8. This ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE SUSPENSION/REVOCATION ORDER AND TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE is the California DMV paper which you should have received.


7. Even if you did not receive this DMV paper, the California DMV will probably take action against your driving privileges.


6. Even if you have a license from another state, and even if the officer did not take your license, that state may also take action against your driving privileges.


5. This TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE ENDORSEMENT is valid for only thirty (30) days from the issue date.


If a DMV hearing is requested within ten (10) days, your DMV TEMPORARY will be extended & there will be a stay (delay) of any suspension until the outcome of your DMV hearing is determined.


4. Do not confuse this initial 30 day TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE with your court date!

The DMV and criminal proceedings are separate and independent. The outcome of one almost never affects the other. Sometimes the officer or the DMV paper confuses or misleads you to believe that the TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE is good "until the court date". If there are approximately thirty (30) days from your arrest date to your court date, this may just be a dangerous coincidence. There usually are months before your DMV hearing takes place.


3. There are three (3) issues at the hearing if you completed a chemical test. (See reverse side of DMV paper.)


Issues are whether the officer had probable cause to stop or contact you or whether the chemical test evidence is beatable.


2. The DMV has the burden of proof to prevail on all three (3) issues. If DMV meets the burden of proof on two (2) issues, you win!


1. All a DMV attorney has to do is knock out one (1) DMV issue to save your license & you avoid any reissue fee and/or Proof of Insurance SR-22 filing!





Click to contact California DUI Attorneys:

San Diego DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI Attorney


California DUI Attorney


San Diego DUI Help

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

California DUI laws & DMV considerations in a California DUI / DMV defense case

California DUI criminal defense lawyers at http://www.sandiegodui.com/defenses.html
and California drunk driving attorneys at http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/blood.html are often
asked about California DUI laws.

In California, the DUI laws are written under the California
Vehicle Code VC 23152 Alcohol and/or Drugs. The DUI law was
codified back in 1935. The law distinguishes between a
misdemeanor and felony. According to its definition, a
misdemeanor does not imply any injury to person or property.
The section 23152 is specific in dealing with drunk driving
misdemeanors. The penalty for such a crime can be up to 6
months in jail.


The law makes driving after drinking or consuming any other
substance that influences the senses unlawful. The phrase
DUI is highly litigated and much debated, especially since it
can't be clearly defined and symptoms vary from person to
person. The commonly accepted definition of under the
influence refers to any person who is not fully conscious,
tends to stumble, loses coordination or reacts slowly. The
definition also includes the partial loss of visual sense.

California law also quantifies the unlawful limit of alcohol as
being .08% of the weight of the person. So, you are unfit to
drive if you have consumed more alcohol than .08% of your
body weight.

A person is required to undergo a chemical test if he or she
is arrested under California DUI. The results of this chemical test are
used as evidence in court. Therefore, the court will
consider it as a final proof of your guilt and pass sentence
accordingly if you are unable to prove the chemical test
results incorrect.

There are several California defense attorneys who are specialists in California DUI.
Apart from chemical tests, several other factors also
influence your California trial, such as your previous record and the California
charges against you. California's good attorneys can use technical
expertise to assist in the best possible representation.

What you must do within 10 days of being arrested of a California DUI:

10. If you need to save your driver's license or privileges, your California DUIattorney has only ten (10) calendar days to contact DMV!



Do not schedule yourself. If you contact DMV to schedule a date conflicting with your California DUI attorney's calendar, DMV will not reschedule and you may not get the California DUI attorney of your choice. There is no rush as long as your California DUI attorney contacts DMV by the 10th day from your arrest.



9. The ten (10) day time limit is computed from the Issue date of the SUSPENSION/REVOCATION ORDER AND TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE. If time is running out or you are late, contact an attorney ASAP.



8. This ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE SUSPENSION/REVOCATION ORDER AND TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE is the California DMV paper which you should have received.



7. Even if you did not receive this DMV paper, the California DMV will probably take action against your driving privileges.



6. Even if you have a license from another state, and even if the officer did not take your license, that state may also take action against your driving privileges.



5. This TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE ENDORSEMENT is valid for only thirty (30) days from the issue date.



If a DMV hearing is requested within ten (10) days, your DMV TEMPORARY will be extended & there will be a stay (delay) of any suspension until the outcome of your DMV hearing is determined.



4. Do not confuse this initial 30 day TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE with your court date!

The DMV and criminal proceedings are separate and independent. The outcome of one almost never affects the other. Sometimes the officer or the DMV paper confuses or misleads you to believe that the TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE is good "until the court date". If there are approximately thirty (30) days from your arrest date to your court date, this may just be a dangerous coincidence. There usually are months before your DMV hearing takes place.



3. There are three (3) issues at the hearing if you completed a chemical test. (See reverse side of DMV paper.)



Issues are whether the officer had probable cause to stop or contact you or whether the chemical test evidence is beatable.



2. The DMV has the burden of proof to prevail on all three (3) issues. If DMV meets the burden of proof on two (2) issues, you win!



1. All a California DUI-DMV attorney has to do is knock out one (1) DMV issue to save your license & you avoid any reissue fee and/or Proof of Insurance SR-22 filing!






Click on below sites for more information or to contact a California DUI Lawyer who can help:

California DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego DUI Help

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

License Process After a California DUI encounter

California DUI criminal defense lawyers at http://www.sandiegodui.com/survey.html and California drunk driving criminal defense attorneys at http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/victory.html explain what you must do within 10 days of being arrested for a California DUI.

10. If you need to save your driver's license or privileges, your California DUI attorney has only ten (10) calendar days to contact DMV!



Do not schedule yourself. If you contact DMV to schedule a date conflicting with your California DUI attorney's calendar, DMV will not reschedule and you may not get the California DUI attorney of your choice. There is no rush as long as your California DUI attorney contacts DMV by the 10th day from your California DUI arrest.



9. The ten (10) day time limit is computed from the Issue date of the SUSPENSION/REVOCATION ORDER AND TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE. If time is running out or you are late, contact a California DUI attorney ASAP.



8. This ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE SUSPENSION/REVOCATION ORDER AND TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE is the California DMV paper which you should have received.



7. Even if you did not receive this DMV paper, the California DMV will probably take action against your driving privileges.



6. Even if you have a license from another state, and even if the California DUI officer did not take your license, that state may also take action against your driving privileges.



5. This TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE ENDORSEMENT is valid for only thirty (30) days from the issue date.



If a DMV hearing is requested within ten (10) days, your DMV TEMPORARY will be extended & there will be a stay (delay) of any suspension until the outcome of your DMV hearing is determined.



4. Do not confuse this initial 30 day TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE with your court date!

The DMV and criminal proceedings are separate and independent. The outcome of one almost never affects the other. Sometimes the officer or the DMV paper confuses or misleads you to believe that the TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSE is good "until the court date". If there are approximately thirty (30) days from your arrest date to your court date, this may just be a dangerous coincidence. There usually are months before your DMV hearing takes place.



3. There are three (3) issues at the hearing if you completed a California DUI chemical test. (See reverse side of DMV paper.)



Issues are whether the California DUI officer had probable cause to stop or contact you or whether the California DUI chemical test evidence is valid and reliable.



2. The DMV has the burden of proof to prevail on all three (3) issues. If DMV meets the burden of proof on two (2) issues, you win!



1. All a California DUI-DMV attorney has to do is knock out one (1) DMV issue to save your license & you avoid any reissue fee and/or Proof of Insurance SR-22 filing!






Click on below sites to contact a California DUI Lawyer from this list:

California DUI Lawyer


California DUI


California DUI Attorney


California DUI Help

Monday, February 23, 2009

San Diego California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar

California DUI Lawyer information provided by a top San Diego California Drunk Driving Attorney for those accused of a San Diego California DUI.



Worry-free San Diego California DUI help for San Diego California DUI court and San Diego California DMV. Complete San Diego California DUI Help to save your California license or other state license.



San Diego DUI Attorney Rick Mueller is a Premier San Diego California Drunk Driving Lawyer, San Diego California DUI & San Diego California DMV Defense Attorney with over 24 years of experience. Known as the San Diego California DUI - DMV Guru, San Diego California DUI Lawyer Rick Mueller dedicates 100% of his San Diego DUI law practice to aggressively defending those accused of San Diego Driving Under the Influence.



San Diego California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar in Rancho Mirage, California: http://www.cacj.org/Events/forms/DUI%20Brochure%20Final.pdf . The California criminal defense lawyers who attended indicated to the President of the California DUI Lawyers Association that San Diego California DUI criminal defense attorney Rick Mueller was the most helpful.

Simply complete the Free San Diego California DUI Evaluation at http://www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net/survey.html for your best San Diego California DUI defense attorney strategy and to vigorously protect your important driving privilege, as has been done for many good people who necessarily become San Diego California DUI Clients.


See the below for more information or to contact a DUI Lawyer in CA:

San Diego DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego DUI Help



http://www.google.com

San Diego California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar

California DUI Lawyer information provided by a top San Diego California Drunk Driving Attorney for those accused of a San Diego California DUI.



Worry-free San Diego California DUI help for San Diego California DUI court and San Diego California DMV. Complete San Diego California DUI Help to save your California license or other state license.



San Diego DUI Attorney Rick Mueller is a Premier San Diego California Drunk Driving Lawyer, San Diego California DUI & San Diego California DMV Defense Attorney with over 24 years of experience. Known as the San Diego California DUI - DMV Guru, San Diego California DUI Lawyer Rick Mueller dedicates 100% of his San Diego DUI law practice to aggressively defending those accused of San Diego Driving Under the Influence.



San Diego California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar in Rancho Mirage, California: http://www.cacj.org/Events/forms/DUI%20Brochure%20Final.pdf . The California criminal defense lawyers who attended indicated to the President of the California DUI Lawyers Association that San Diego California DUI criminal defense attorney Rick Mueller was the most helpful.

Simply complete the Free San Diego California DUI Evaluation at http://www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net/survey.html for your best San Diego California DUI defense attorney strategy and to vigorously protect your important driving privilege, as has been done for many good people who necessarily become San Diego California DUI Clients.


See the below for more information or to contact a DUI Lawyer in CA:

San Diego DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego DUI Help



http://www.google.com

Sunday, February 22, 2009

California DUI checkpoint results for Riverside weekend action

California DUI criminal defense attorneys at http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/articles.html and California drunk driving lawyers at http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/articles.html are told on Friday, February 21, 2009, the Riverside Police Department conducted a California DUI/Drivers License checkpoint on Van Buren Boulevard and Morris Street in the City of Riverside. Several volunteers, police explorers, and police cadets from the Department were on hand to assist with the California drunk driving effort.

The California dui checkpoint was in operation between the hours of 6:00 PM and 12:00 AM; more than 2467 vehicles drove through the checkpoint. There were six (6) subjects arrested for California DUI, forty-four (44) citations were issued, and forty (40) vehicles were impounded.

Funding for this California drunk driving program was provided by a DUI grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

California DUI Criminal Defense Lawyer - California Attorney Drunk Driving can help you beat the San Diego drunk driving charge: http://www.SanDiegoDUIhelp.com

California DUI Defense Resource Center at http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/blog.html

California DUI Criminal Defense Lawyer list:

California DUI Lawyer


California DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego California DUI Help







http://www.google.com


http://www.sandiegoduihelp.com/duiblog/index.html

Saturday, February 21, 2009

California DUI Checkpoint in Sacramento Tonight looking for drunk drivers and generating public cash

California DUI criminal defense attorneys and California drunk driving criminal defense lawyers are told the Sacramento police will be conducting a California DUI sobriety and driver's license checkpoint on Saturday in the north area, a California DUI attoneys heard Friday.

California DUI Officers will check if drivers are California DUI - under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and if they have a valid license.

The California DUI program, funded by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, is to promote public safety.

The California DUI program aims to increase awareness of the dangers associated with drinking and driving and to deter drivers from California DUI driving under influence, California DUI lawyers said.

About two hours before the start of the California DUI checkpoint, the California DUI department will release information specifying the location and duration of the California DUI checkpoint operation.

California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar in Rancho Mirage, California: http://www.cacj.org/Events/forms/DUI%20Brochure%20Final.pdf . The California criminal defense lawyers who attended informed the President of the California DUI Lawyers Association that San Diego California DUI criminal defense attorney Rick Mueller was very good.

List of California DUI Lawyers and California drunk driving Attorneys:

Friday, February 20, 2009

California DUI checkpoint in Los Angeles Area Tonight!

California DUI criminal defense attorneys at http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/blog.html want to know about Californa drunk driving checkpoints this weekend.

California DUI Lawyer Rick Mueller, a California DUI / Drunk Driving / DWI Defense Attorney handling California DUI & DMV cases, shows how a California DUI Lawyer will help you. http://www.sandiegoduihelp.com/links.html.

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department will conduct a DUI/drivers license checkpoint tomorrow, Fri., Feb. 20 from 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. in Calabasas.

To reduce the number of people killed and injured in alcohol-related crashes, DUI checkpoints are conducted to get offenders off the street and educate the public on the dangers of impaired driving.

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department believes that by publicizing DUI checkpoints motorists can be deterred from drinking and driving.

Traffic volume and weather permitting, all vehicles may be checked and drivers who are under the influence of alcohol or drugs will be arrested.

Funding comes from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

California DUI Lawyer Rick Mueller, a California DUI / Drunk Driving / DWI Defense Attorney handling California DUI & DMV cases, shows how a California DUI Lawyer will help you. http://www.sandiegoduihelp.com/links.html

California DUI Defense Lawyer Rick Mueller dedicates 100% of his law practice to aggressively defending those accused of driving under the influence of alcohol. He has successfully saved the driving privileges of many clients in the past year alone. Complete the important Free California DUI / Drunk Driving Defense Survey. http://www.sandiegodui.com/victory.html

California DUI Criminal Defense Lawyer list:

California DUI Lawyer


California DUI


California DUI Attorney


California DUI Help







http://www.google.com


http://www.sandiegoduihelp.com/duiblog/index.html

www.Yahoo.com

Thursday, February 19, 2009

California DUI checkpoints keep on coming!

California DUI criminal defense lawyers at www.SanDiegoDUI.com/index.html and California drunk driving defense attorneys at www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net/articles.html report The Roseville Police Department is conducting a California DUI saturation patrol Saturday evening, February 21. Officers will be out in force patrolling for California drunken and drug-impaired drivers.

“Safety is our number one concern, and that means getting drunk drivers off our streets,” Roseville Police Chief Mike Blair said. “Too many people have been killed and injured in Roseville because of California impaired driving.”

The good news is that overall, traffic-related deaths and injuries are down in Roseville California. Both total Californiacollisions and collisions involving death or injury were down six percent in 2008 compared to 2007.

The bad news is that alcohol and other drug-related collisions are on the rise. Roseville California Police officers investigated 19 percent more California DUI-related crashes in 2008 than 2007. One person was killed last year and 65 were injured by California drunk drivers. The Roseville Police Department is battling the problem with routine nightly California DUI enforcement, California DUI and driver’s license checkpoints, California DUI saturation patrols, and California DUI warrant sweeps.

Funding for Roseville’s California DUI enforcement efforts is provided by a $100,000 grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

http://www.sandiegodui.com/
http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com
http://www.SanDiegoDrunkDrivingAttorney.net
http://www.google.com
http://www.sandiegoduihelp.com/duiblog/index.html
http://www.yahoo.com
http://wwww.sandiegodui.com/criminal

http://www.sandiegoduihelp.com

http://www.sandiegodui.com/about.html

San Diego DUI Lawyer Rick Mueller, a San Diego Drunk Driving / DWI Defense Attorney handling San Diego California DUI & DMV cases, shows how a Top-Rated San Diego DUI Lawyer will help you. http://www.SanDiegoDUILawyer.com

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

'Badly Fragmented' Forensic Science System Needs Overhaul

California DUI attorneys report
'Badly Fragmented' Forensic Science System Needs Overhaul

February 18, 2009 -- A congressionally mandated report from the National Research Council finds serious deficiencies in the nation's forensic science system and calls for major reforms and new research. Mandatory certification programs for forensic scientists are currently lacking, as are strong standards and protocols for analyzing and reporting on evidence. There is also a scarcity of peer-reviewed studies establishing the scientific bases and reliability of many forensic methods.

http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12589

Gary Collins & DA's son highlight California DUI news

California DUI defense lawyers note news about drunk drdiving cases in California.

Gary Collins supersized his ride, and now a judge might supersize his punishment.

The former Hour Magazine host is facing DUI charges stemming from his Jan. 31 arrest in Montecito, Calif., for allegedly being behind the wheel of a motor home while intoxicated—his third DUI bust this decade and second in the past two years.

Police said his blood-alcohol level at the time of his arrest was 0.29, more than three times the legal limit.

The veteran TV personality was charged with misdemeanor driving under the influence and driving with a blood-alcohol level of 0.08 percent or above. Arraignment has been set for March 2 and jail time is almost certain if he's convicted in light of his record.

Collins was sentenced to four years' probation and spent four days in a Glendale, Calif., jail in January 2008 after copping to drunken driving charges. He was found not guilty of DUI in 2002 in Mississippi.

In other dui news, the father of a 22-year-old musician killed by a drunken driving suspect expressed forgiveness Tuesday for 18-year-old Dylan Morse, but said he must be held accountable. Michael Ruiz said his son Alex Ruiz, a Calistoga High School graduate and Berkeley art school student, would have wanted Morse, the son of Merced County prosecutor Larry Morse II, “to come through it ... to spiral up out of this.”

But he said the teenager should accept responsibility for his actions in a court of law. Morse remained in jail Tuesday on $100,000 bail and was expected to be arraigned today on suspicion of drunken driving and manslaughter.

“Alex and our family wish him the very best in his life,” Ruiz said. “Not in any superficial way. We do have a lot of compassion for him, for Dylan.”

Whether or not you ultimately end up hiring a California DUI Specialist attorney, it is a smart idea to speak to a California DUI Specialist lawyer in this highly complex field.



You can read more -Why use San Diego County's Specialist in DUI and DMV Law http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/why.html .


Or try a Free California DUI Evaluation at http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/survey.html .

San Diego California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar in Rancho Mirage, California: .

Click on below sites for more information or to contact a San Diego DUI Lawyer in California:

San Diego DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego DUI Help

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

California DUI Officer May Not Offer His Opinion of One's BAC based on Nystagmus / FST Performance

People v. Loomis (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1 [203 Cal.Rptr. 767]

Cite Alert 3d Series Cite Alert 4th Series

Appellate Department, Superior Court, San Diego.

[Crim. A. No. 65544.

March 29, 1984.]

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STEPHEN C. LOOMIS, Defendant
and Appellant.

(Opinion by McConnell, J., with Woodworth, P. J., and Milkes, J.,
concurring.)

COUNSEL

Thomas J. Warwick, Jr., and Grimes & Warwick for Defendant and Appellant.

Edwin L. Miller, Jr., District Attorney, Susan Biery and Evan Miller,
Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

McCONNELL, J.

Stephen Loomis appeals a judgment of conviction of Vehicle Code section
23152, subdivision (a) after a jury trial and an order of probation.

Loomis was driving his red Ferrari on Highway 101 in San Diego County
when he was stopped by Officer Nickelson of the California Highway
Patrol (CHP). The officer had observed Loomis make a quick U-turn on the
highway and had paced the Ferrari which drove at a speed of 70 miles per
hour and straddled the lane lines much of the time. When the officer
stopped Loomis, he observed him exiting the vehicle, swaying from side
to side. His eyes were red and watery and he had a strong odor of an
alcoholic beverage on his breath.

The officer administered a lateral gaze nystagmus test to Loomis and,
based on that test, formed an opinion as to the level of blood alcohol
in Loomis' body at the time he was stopped. The court allowed the
officer to testify not as an expert but as a lay person basing his
opinion on his training, experience, and the number of times he had
given the test.

A lateral gaze nystagmus test involves requesting the person at the time
of the stop to concentrate on an object (usually a pen) held by the
officer {Page 156 Cal.App.3d Supp. 4} slightly above the driver's eye
level. The object is held initially directly ahead of the driver's
eyeball which is centered and is looking straightforward in relation to
the head. The object is then moved toward the outside of the driver's
field of vision, toward his ear and away from his nose. The officer then
observes the onset of an involuntary oscillation of the eyeball, and
measures the angle of onset of the oscillation in relation to the center
point. The officer then calculates the blood alcohol level based upon
the angle of onset of the oscillation.

The officer testified he had been a police officer for five and one-half
years and had received 300 to 400 hours of training in the detection of
drinking drivers. He had worked for a special CHP-drinking driver detail
for almost three years. He had stopped over 2,500 people suspected of
driving under the influence and had used the lateral gaze nystagmus test
in all of those stops. He had been taught how to administer the test and
had attended refresher courses on the subject. He had arrested just
under 1,000 people for driving under the influence of alcohol and had
compared the results of his field tests against a chemical test in about
half the arrests. He stated he was within .02 percent of the chemical
test about 96 percent of the time. The officer could not recall the
names of any publications he had read or instructors on the subject.

The officer testified to his opinion, based on the above test, that
Loomis had a reaction at less than 20 degrees and estimated Loomis'
blood alcohol level between .15 and .16. The officer also testified
Loomis admitted having had a few glasses of wine and stated, "I'm drunk,
I know it, take me to jail." Loomis was advised of the requirements of
the implied consent law three times, according to the officer, but
refused to take a chemical test.

A lab technician from the sheriff's crime laboratory testified she was
aware of the lateral gaze nystagmus test and had administered it
approximately five to ten times in the last two to three years. She said
she was unable to give a blood alcohol level based on the angle of
oscillation but she did not feel it was impossible for one who had
administered the test numerous times to do so. The basis for her opinion
on this matter was not reflected in the record. In her opinion a person
had a blood alcohol level greater than .10 and was under the influence
when he showed a reaction at less than 20 degrees.

Prior to trial, the court had ordered the prosecutor to disclose the
names and addresses of all persons present at the time of the arrest and
subsequent incarceration. During the trial, the officer testified that
he had been accompanied by a citizen "ride-along" at the time of Loomis'
arrest. He further testified it was the policy of the CHP to destroy any
record of the names of {Page 156 Cal.App.3d Supp. 5} ride-alongs to
avoid any inconvenience to these citizens and specifically to avoid
having them subpoenaed to court or required to testify. The officer
stated he had not listed the name of the ride-along in the police report
in this case to prevent subpoenas. He testified it was departmental
policy to omit the identity of the ride-along from the police report and
he could not recall the name at the time of trial. The ride-along had
remained next to the police vehicle at the time of the stop and had
accompanied the officer and Loomis to the jail.

At trial defense counsel objected to the testimony of the officer on his
opinion of Loomis' blood alcohol level based on the lateral gaze
nystagmus test. The objection was overruled. Defense counsel also made a
motion to dismiss based on the intentional destruction of evidence
potentially favorable to the defendant. The motion was denied. The jury
returned a verdict of guilty and defendant was sentenced to five days in
custody and ordered to pay $600 as a condition of three years probation.

[1a] Loomis contends the trial court erred when it allowed the officer
to testify as a lay witness and give his opinion of the blood alcohol
level based on the lateral gaze nystagmus test. We agree.

[2] "A lay or nonexpert witness may testify concerning a matter in the
form of an opinion only if such opinion (a) is based on his own
perception of the facts from which his opinion is drawn; and (b) is
helpful to a clear understanding of his testimony." (2 Jefferson, Cal.
Evidence Benchbook (2d ed. 1982) p. 975.)

Evidence Code section 800 provides: "If a witness is not testifying as
an expert, his testimony in the form of an opinion is limited to such an
opinion as is permitted by law, including but not limited to an opinion
that is: (a) Rationally based on the perception of the witness; and (b)
Helpful to a clear understanding of his testimony."

It is fundamental in the law of evidence that a nonexpert witness can
only testify to those facts which he perceives with his senses. Lay
witnesses have been allowed to give opinions on subjects such as state
of intoxication, age, speed or other measurements, and other similar topics.

[1b] In the present case the officer testified to the oscillation of the
driver's pupil at a certain angle. That is certainly something he could
have perceived. What is not based on his perception, however, is the
officer's opinion that such oscillation at that angle indicates a blood
alcohol level of .12 percent. That conclusion could not possibly be
based on the officer's {Page 156 Cal.App.3d Supp. 6} own perceptions and
could be admitted only if the evidence is admissible as expert testimony.

Accordingly the trial court erred when it ruled the officer was not
testifying as an expert but could give an opinion of blood alcohol level
based on his training, experience and the number of times he had given
the nystagmus test. Even if the officer's testimony had been offered as
an expert opinion, it would have been error to allow it.

[3] In People v. Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24, 30 [130 Cal.Rptr. 144, 549
P.2d 1240], the Supreme Court stated the law with regard to
admissibility of expert testimony:

"[A]dmissibility of expert testimony based upon the application of a new
scientific technique traditionally involves a two-step process: (1) the
reliability of the method must be established, usually by expert
testimony, and (2) the witness furnishing such testimony must be
properly qualified as an expert to give an opinion on the subject.
(Citations omitted.) Additionally, the proponent of the evidence must
demonstrate that correct scientific procedures were used in the
particular case. (Citations omitted.)

"The test for determining the underlying reliability of a new scientific
technique was described in the germinal case of Frye v. United States
(D.C. Cir. 1923) 293 F. 1013, 1014, involving the admissibility of
polygraph tests: 'Just when a scientific principle or discovery crosses
the line between the experimental and demonstrable stages is difficult
to define. Somewhere in this twilight zone the evidential force of the
principle must be recognized, and while courts will go a long way in
admitting expert testimony deduced from a well-recognized scientific
principle or discovery, the thing from which the deduction is made must
be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the
particular field in which it belongs.'"

[1c] Applying this rule to the present case makes it clear the testimony
regarding Loomis' blood alcohol level based on the lateral gaze
nystagmus test was inadmissible.

It is well established in California law that a new form of evidence of
a scientific nature will be allowed only when there is a preliminary
showing of general acceptance of the new technique in the scientific
community. This rule is particularly important in a case such as this,
since the evidence of blood alcohol is usually given very great weight
by the trier of fact. We have found no authority in California law which
discusses the admissibility of testimony as to blood alcohol level based
on the test employed here, nor has any other authority been presented
from other jurisdictions. {Page 156 Cal.App.3d Supp. 7}

There is nothing in the record before us to show the reliability of the
nystagmus test has been generally accepted by recognized authorities.
The officer did not recall any writings concerning the test, and the
evidence technician from the crime laboratory appeared only slightly
familiar with the test. Loomis' counsel has appended to his brief an
article on "Alcoholic Gaze Nystagmus" fn. 1 which does not reflect
general acceptance of the test in the scientific community.

It is clear the evidence here did not meet the criteria of Kelly, supra,
17 Cal.3d 24, since neither the reliability of the method nor the
qualification of the witness as an expert on the subject was
established. Since there is no indication of general acceptance in the
scientific community of the nystagmus test as an indicator of blood
alcohol level, the evidence should have been excluded.

[4] Loomis further contends intentional destruction of evidence deprived
him of a fair trial. The evidence in this case showed the policy of the
CHP is to destroy any document indicating the name of a citizen who
rides along as an observer. The policy also mandates the omission of the
name or presence of this person at the scene from the police report. The
officer, at trial, had no recall of the name of his ride-along. At trial
Loomis moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground the suppression of
material evidence deprived him of due process of law. This motion should
have been granted.

In People v. Mejia (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 574 [129 Cal.Rptr. 192], the
court upheld dismissal of a felony prosecution where percipient
witnesses arrested with defendant were unavailable to testify as they
had been released to immigration officials and deported. The court
stated, at page 580: "Generally speaking the People may select and
choose which witnesses they wish to use to prove their case against a
defendant. They are not, however, under principles of basic fairness,
privileged to control the proceedings by choosing which material
witnesses shall, and which shall not, be available to the accused in
presenting his defense."

The court in Cordova v. Superior Court (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 177 [195
Cal.Rptr. 758], reaffirmed the rule set forth in Mejia, and quoting
other sources stated, at page 181: "... 'If ... state action has made a
material witness unavailable, dismissal is mandated by due process and a
defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial .... "The fundamental
due process principle ... is that the prosecution may not deprive an
accused of the opportunity to present material evidence which might
prove his innocence ...."'" (Citations omitted.) {Page 156 Cal.App.3d
Supp. 8}

The facts here are even more egregious than in the cases cited. The
record shows the police deliberately destroyed evidence of the identity
of the percipient witness to avoid subjecting that witness to the
inconvenience of having to testify in court. At least in Mejia the names
of the witnesses were retained so that a search could at least be
attempted. Here the identity of the witness was completely suppressed.
We hold that due process requires the retention of the identity of a
citizen witness who accompanies an officer on his duties. Retaining this
information would not impose a significant burden on law enforcement.

For all the above reasons the judgment of the trial court is reversed
and the case is remanded with instructions the complaint be dismissed.

Woodworth, P. J., and Milkes, J., concurred.

­FN 1. Erwin, Defense of Drunk Driving Cases (3d ed. 1983) page 8-24.

California Vehicle Code (Speeding Enhancement) in California DUI cases - 60 days mandatory jail

California DUI criminal defense attorneys are often asked about the Speeding Enhancement allegation in California drunk driving cases. Just how fast can one go when California DUI in order to qualify for the mandatory 60 days custody?

Answer: California Vehicle Code (Speeding Enhancement)

23582. (a) Any person who drives a vehicle 30 or more miles per
hour over the maximum, prima facie, or posted speed limit on a
freeway, or 20 or more miles per hour over the maximum, prima facie,
or posted speed limit on any other street or highway, and in a manner
prohibited by Section 23103 during the commission of a violation of
Section 23152 or 23153 shall, in addition to the punishment
prescribed for that person upon conviction of a violation of Section
23152 or 23153, be punished by an additional and consecutive term of
60 days in the county jail.

(b) If the court grants probation or suspends the execution of
sentence, it shall require as a condition of probation or suspension
that the defendant serve 60 days in the county jail, in addition and
consecutive to any other sentence prescribed by this chapter.

(c) On a first conviction under this section, the court shall
order the driver to participate in, and successfully complete, an
alcohol or drug education and counseling program, or both an alcohol
and a drug education and counseling program. Except in unusual cases
where the interests of justice would be served, a finding making
this section applicable to a defendant shall not be stricken pursuant
to Section 1385 of the Penal Code or any other provision of law. If
the court decides not to impose the additional and consecutive term,
it shall specify on the court record the reasons for that order.

(d) The additional term provided in this section shall not be
imposed unless the facts of driving in a manner prohibited by Section
23103 and driving the vehicle 30 or more miles per hour over the
maximum, prima facie, or posted speed limit on a freeway, or 20 or
more miles per hour over the maximum, prima facie, or posted speed
limit on any other street or highway, are charged in the accusatory
pleading and admitted or found to be true by the trier of fact. A
finding of driving in that manner shall be based on facts in addition
to the fact that the defendant was driving while under the influence
of alcohol, any drug, or both, or with a specified percentage of
alcohol in the blood.


California DUI Lawyers:

San Diego California DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego California DUI Help

Monday, February 16, 2009

Son of California District Attorney arrested for California DUI

California DUI criminal defense lawyers are told that the son of Merced County District Attorney Larry Morse II was arrested Saturday in Sonoma County on suspicion of felony California DUI - driving under the influence and manslaughter.

The California Highway Patrol reported the arrest of 18-year-old Dylan Morse after he allegedly ran a red light and broadsided a Honda, killing the 22-year-old driver.

The elder Morse released a statement which made its way to California dui criminal defense attorneys on Sunday via his assistant: "There aren't enough words to convey the sorrow we feel. Through the actions of our son, a young man's life was taken," Morse said. "And our son's dear friend, Ryne, is fighting for his life. Dylan is our first child and as parents we are heartbroken."

In the statement, Morse also said the prayers of him and his wife are with the victim's family.

CHP investigators say Morse was driving a 1998 Volvo about 2:20 a.m. when he allegedly failed to stop at a red light at the intersection of Stony Point Road and Highway 116 near Cotati.

The driver of the Honda, an unidentified Richmond resident, was pronounced dead at the scene. Morse's passenger, 19-year-old Ryne Spitzer of Merced, suffered life-threatening injuries and was taken to Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, the CHP reported.

The passenger in the Honda, 25-year-old Vanessa King of Berkeley, was also transported to Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital and treated for major injuries not considered life-threatening. Morse was not injured, according to the CHP.

The best is hoped for everyone.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

How to find a Competent California DUI & Drunk Driving Criminal Defense Lawyer who also effectively handles DMV cases

How can you find a qualified San Diego California DUI Lawyer ?



Various types of lawyers handle San Diego drunk driving cases, including public defenders, general practitioners, criminal defense lawyers, and DUI Specialist attorneys.



A San Diego County public defender is a California attorney provided at little or no cost to provide defense services to people who financially are unable to hire a private San Diego lawyer. Most San Diego County Districts generally do not offer public defenders services unless you are unemployed, significantly under-employed and/or have no assets.



Some excellent questions to begin asking when searching for a California DUI lawyer are:



What are his or her California DUI attorney's qualifications?



Is he or she a Specialist member of the California DUI Lawyers Association?



Is he or she a member of the National College for DUI Defense?



Whether or not you ultimately end up hiring a California DUI Specialist attorney, it is a smart idea to speak to a California DUI Specialist lawyer in this highly complex field.



You can read more -Why use San Diego County's Specialist in DUI and DMV Law http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/why.html .


Or try a Free California DUI Evaluation at http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/survey.html .





San Diego California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar in Rancho Mirage, California: http://www.cacj.org/Events/forms/DUI%20Brochure%20Final.pdf . The California criminal defense lawyers who attended informed the President of the California DUI Lawyers Association that San Diego California DUI criminal defense attorney Rick Mueller was excellent. Rick has been asked to speak again - at the California DUI Lawyers Association (CDLA) DUI seminar.


Click on below sites for more information or to contact a San Diego DUI Lawyer who can help:

San Diego DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego DUI Help

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Don't hit California DUI Police and don't kill someone running a red light unless you want a felony

California DUI criminal lawyers and California Drunk Driving defense attorneys visibility report felony DUI cases in California:

Police say a Simi Valley man has been arrested on suspicion of felony California DUI drunk driving.
California DUI Authorities arrested Antonio Edward Riccio after the van he was driving collided head-on with a Simi Valley police cruiser on Thursday.

Officer Sam Clarkson of the California Highway patrol says Riccio and Sgt. Alan Thompson, who was in the cruiser, were taken by ambulance to Simi Valley. Both men were treated and released.

Riccio was booked into Ventura County jail Friday morning on suspicion of California DUI driving under the influence and causing injury. He has been released from jail after posting $50,000 bail.

In other California DUI news, an 18-year-old Merced man was arrested early Saturday on felony DUI and manslaughter charges after he ran a red light at Stony Point Road and Highway 116 and broad-sided a car crossing the intersection, killing the driver.

Dylan Morse of Merced was driving southbound in a 1998 Volvo on Stony Point Road west of Rohnert Park at about 2:20 a.m when he failed to stop at a red light, said California Highway Patrol officials.

Witnesses said he was driving about 70 miles per hour when he rammed into an 1988 Honda headed eastbound on Highway 116, which also is Gravenstein Highway. Both cars ended up in a field in the southeast corner of the intersection.

The driver of the Honda, a 22-year-old man from Richmond who was not identified pending notification of family members, was declared dead at the scene.

Morse’s passenger, Ryne Spitzer of Merced, suffered life-threatening injuries and was taken to Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital where he underwent surgery Saturday, California DUI officials said.

The passenger of the Honda, Vanessa King, 25, of Berkeley also was transported to Memorial Hospital and treated for injuries that were not believed to be life-threatening, California DUI lawyers are told.

CHP officials said Morse was not injured. State Alcoholic Beverage Control agents are assisting in the California DUI investigation to determine how Morse might have obtained alcohol. California DUI police do a more thorough research when someone is hurt or killed.

Friday, February 13, 2009

* Updated: California DUI checkpoint Tonight in Riverside, San Bernardino & Santa Barbara California

California DUI criminal defense attorneys and California drunk driving criminal lawyers at http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/blog.html are told about tonight's plans.

Traffic Sgt R. Lawhead explains that the San Bernardino Police Department will be conducting a California DUI/Drivers License checkpoint on Friday, February 13, 2009 from 6:00 PM to 2:00 AM, in the 1500 block of South E Street, in San Bernardino. This California DUI / Drunk Driving program is being conducted in an effort to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in alcohol involved crashes. California DUI / Drunk Driving checkpoints are conducted to identify offenders and get them off the street, as well as to educate the public on the dangers of impaired driving.

All too often, members of our community are senselessly injured or killed on local roadways by impaired drivers. This California DUI / Drunk Driving checkpoint is an effort to reduce those tragedies, as well as insuring that drivers have a valid driver’s license with them. A major component of these checkpoints is to increase awareness of the dangers of impaired driving and to encourage sober designated drivers.

California DUI / Drunk Driving checkpoints are a proven effective method for achieving these goals. By publicizing these enforcement and education efforts, the San Bernardino Police Department believes motorists can be deterred from drinking and driving.

Traffic volume and weather permitting, all vehicles may be checked and drivers who are under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs will be arrested. Our objective is to send a clear message to those who are considering driving a motor vehicle after consuming alcohol and/or drugs – Drunk Driving, Over the Limit, Under Arrest. The public is encouraged to help keep roadways safe by calling 911 if they see a suspected impaired or California DUI / Drunk Driving driver.

Funding for this California DUI / Drunk Driving operation is provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The Santa Barbara Police Department will be conducting DUI Checkpoints in the City of Santa Barbara on the following dates and times. Driver’s licenses will be checked at these checkpoints.

Friday February 13, from 8:00 pm to 3:00 am

The Santa Barbara Police Department encourages everyone to drink responsibly, pre-arrange for a ride home, designate a driver and understand that every officer will be diligently looking for the impaired driver. Additionally, DUI enforcement officers will be on patrol throughout the weekend. We would prefer to arrest the DUI driver than to find them in a collision.

Additionally, we encourage everyone to report the suspected impaired driver by calling “911.” Doing so could save the life of a loved one.

Don’t drink and drive!

The Lake Elsinore Police Department will be conducting a DUI/Safety Checkpoint on Friday, February 13, 2009, between the hours of 6:00 pm and midnight.

The Lake Elsinore Police Department has a “Zero Tolerance” approach toward DUI drivers and those driving unlicensed or with a suspended license. These drivers are responsible for a majority of the hit and run collisions that occur within the city.

The checkpoint is funded through a grant by State of California’s Office of Traffic Safety through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and will consist of officers from the Lake Elsinore Police Department as well as volunteers, Riverside County Sheriff Posse and Lake Elsinore Police Explorers.

How can you find a qualified California DUI Lawyer ?



Various types of lawyers handle California drunk driving cases, including public defenders, general practitioners, criminal defense lawyers, and DUI Specialist attorneys.



A California County public defender is a California attorney provided at little or no cost to provide defense services to people who financially are unable to hire a private California lawyer. Most California County Districts generally do not offer public defenders services unless you are unemployed, significantly under-employed and/or have no assets.



Some excellent questions to begin asking when searching for a California DUI lawyer are:



What are his or her California DUI attorney's qualifications?



Is he or she a Specialist member of the California DUI Lawyers Association?



Is he or she a member of the National College for DUI Defense?



Whether or not you ultimately end up hiring a California DUI Specialist attorney, it is a smart idea to speak to a California DUI Specialist lawyer in this highly complex field.



Why use California's Specialist in DUI and DMV Law http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/why.html .


Or try a Free California DUI Evaluation at http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/survey.html .

California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar in Rancho Mirage, California: http://www.cacj.org/Events/forms/DUI%20Brochure%20Final.pdf . The California criminal defense lawyers who attended informed the President of the California DUI Lawyers Association that San Diego California DUI criminal defense attorney Rick Mueller was really good.

Click on below sites for more information or to contact a California DUI Lawyer who can help:

California DUI Lawyer


California DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego California DUI Help

Thursday, February 12, 2009

More California DUI MADD awards given out as incentive to make California DUI arrests

California DUI criminal defense lawyers report that the North State Regional Avoid the 30 gathered Tuesday at the Hilton Garden Inn to recognize California DUI law enforcement officers from Tehama County as well as Siskiyou, Shasta, Glenn and Butte counties.

Christopher Murphy, director, California Office of Traffic Safety, Bill Kootsikas, regional program manager, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Dave Radford, California District Attorneys Association, Traffic Safety Resource prosecutor were guest speakers at this California DUI event.

California DUI Recognition awards were presented for officers' California DUI enforcement during 2008. Carmen Lopez, president of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, Shasta Chapter, and was on hand to distribute the annual MADD Awards to each California DUI officer that had 25 or more California DUI arrests during the year. In 2008, 48 California DUI officers arrested 2,350 California DUI suspects.

California's Avoid DUI Campaign coincides with the national Drunk Driving. Over the Limit. Under Arrest campaign nationwide.


California DUI Lawyer Rick Mueller, a California DUI Drunk Driving / DWI Defense Attorney handling San Diego California DUI & DMV cases, shows how a Top-Rated California DUI Lawyer will help you.California DUI Lawyer - San Diego Attorney Drunk Driving can help you beat the San Diego drunk driving charge: California DUI Criminal Lawyer Rick Mueller, a California DUI / Drunk Driving / DWI Defense Attorney handling San Diego California DUI & DMV cases, shows how a San Diego DUI Lawyer will help you.


San Diego DUI Defense Resource Center:

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

10 Reasons to hire California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller

California DUI criminal defense attorneys are asked why hire Rick Mueller of San Diego:

10. California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller is a successful and experienced negotiator.

9. California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller has knowledge of the law relating to California DUI & DMV.

8. California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller responds Promptly and Personally to All Calls.

7. California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller accepts Credit Cards.

6. Your Priorities are California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller's Priorities.

5. California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller is well-respected by both judges and DMV hearing officers.

4. Personal Representation by California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller.

3. California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller has Proven Results with Happy Clients.

2. California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller makes a significant difference.

1. California DUI criminal defense lawyer Rick Mueller's San Diego County DUI Law Center office is dedicated to exclusively to DMV and drunk driving defense in San Diego.

San Bernardino California DUI checkpont friday night - motorists warned

California DUI criminal defense lawyers are told drunken drivers will be targeted Friday night in San Bernardino during a California DUI checkpoint, police say.

The California drunk driving checkpoint will be conducted between 6 p.m. Friday and 2 a.m. Saturday along the 1500 block of South E Street, Sgt. Rich Lawhead said in a written statement.

The California DUI checkpoint is funded by federal grants administered through the California Office of Traffic Safety to help lock up impaired drivers and deter other motorists from driving under the influence.

California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar in Rancho Mirage, California: http://www.cacj.org/Events/forms/DUI%20Brochure%20Final.pdf . The California criminal defense lawyers who attended informed the President of the California DUI Lawyers Association that San Diego California DUI criminal defense attorney Rick Mueller was excellent. Rick has been asked to speak again.

Click on below sites for more information or to contact a San Diego DUI Lawyer who can help:

San Diego DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego DUI Help

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Avoid severe California dui and california drunk driving penalties

California DUI criminal defense lawyers and California drunk driving criminal attorneys at http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/blood.html note that a California DUI conviction can have a major negative impact on your life, which is why it's a good idea to speak with a California DUI lawyer who can help you with your California DUI charge. A California DUI attorney has the potential to spot possible challenges based on what happened during your California DUI questioning, breathalyzer test and arrest. Get answers to all of your questions and advice on the best steps to take in your California DUI case.

How a California DUI lawyer can help you with your DUI charge and how a California DUI Lawyer Is Working Hard for You:

A California DUI lawyer is an important asset to have on your side while you are going through the California DUI process. With the legal expertise of a California drunk driving defense lawyer, you can learn about California DUI laws and how they affect you.

A California DUI attorney can also figure out possible ways for you to win your case or lessen the penalties through plea bargaining. Even after DCalifornia UI court is over, your attorney can advise you on how to move on with your life and possibly clear your driving record in the future.

California DUI or Driving under the influence is considered a very serious crime in all 50 states. If you are convicted of drinking and driving, there are several penalties you could face, including:

Jail
Big fines
Suspension of driver's license
Ignition interlock device
Vehicle impound
Public work service
Lengthy Probation
Alcohol and drug education classes

On top of the California drunk driving penalties, your California DUI conviction could affect your job, car insurance and other aspects of your social life. These are reasons why you should look into how a California DUI attorney can help you.

Let California DUI lawyers do the Work for You

Finding a California DUI attorney can be stressful, but that's where the California DUI lawyer at San Diego County DUI Law Center can take help. Fill out free California DUI case evaluation form

California DUI checkpoint in Northern California, felony DUI for hitting police officer in California

California drunk driving criminal defense lawyers and California DUI criminal defense attorneys at http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/penalty.html report the results of a California DUI checkpoint in Stockton area:

California DUI officers checked 285 cars at a California DUI checkpoint Saturday night, arresting three people for California DUI - driving under the influence and citing 23 others. The California DUI checkpoint was funded through a California Office of Traffic and Safety grant.

In other California DUI news, Folsom Police officer is recovering from minor injuries and a woman is under arrest for suspicion of California drunk driving after a collision that pinned the officer between two patrol cars.

Jennifer Brown, 55, of Folsom is under arrest for suspicion of felony California drunk driving - DUI - driving under the influence after preliminary tests showed she had a blood alcohol concentration more than twice the legal limit of .08.

At about 10:45 p.m. Friday, two officers were conducting a traffic stop in the 600 block of Riley Street. Both of the officer's patrol cars were along the shoulder of the roadway with their overhead lights activated.

The officer standing outside the lead squad car saw a car approaching and in an effort to avoid being struck, he bolted between the police cars. He was pinned between the police vehicles as the suspected California drunk driver plowed into the rear police car.

The officer, who was not named, suffered injury to his leg and hip but he did not have to be transported to the hospital and is expected to make a full recovery. However, according to a Folsom Police press release, he will seek medical attention.

San Diego California DUI Lawyer Rick Mueller, a San Diego Drunk Driving / DWI Defense Attorney handling San Diego California DUI & DMV cases, shows how a San Diego DUI Lawyer will help you. California DUI Criminal Defense Lawyer list:

San Diego DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego DUI Help

Monday, February 9, 2009

California DUI criminal defense lawyers explain new California DUI .01 zero tolerance law

California DUI criminal defense lawyers and California drunk driving criminal defense attorneys at http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/courts.html explain how California DUI Probation Prevents Driver From Having Any Alcohol in System.

Without An Experienced California DUI Criminal Defense Attorney, Driver’s On Probation For A DUI In California May Lose Their License Under New California DUI Law, If Found To Be Driving With Any Measurable Level Of Alcohol In Their System:

Under previous California DUI law, the Department of Motor Vehicles or the California Courts will typically suspend the driver’s driving privilege for up to a year on a first time DUI, and place the driver on probation. DUI offenders who are placed on probation are prohibited from driving with any measurable amount of alcohol in their blood, and are required to submit to a preliminary alcohol screening test if asked to do so by an law enforcement officer. If that person is subsequently found to be driving with a blood alcohol level under the legal limit, an ensuing suspension of driving privileges would not occur. A suspension of the driver’s license would only occur if the person was convicted of a second DUI. A subsequent California DUI conviction would require driving with a blood alcohol level over the legal limit.

As of 2009, California law creates new California DUI legal authority for the DMV to administratively suspend driving privileges for one year if the driver is found with any level of alcohol in their system. This new California DUI law follows California’s zero tolerance standard. The new California DUI law authorizes law enforcement to issue a notice of suspension and impound the driver’s vehicle.

Hiring an experienced California DUI defense law firm can greatly increase your chances of keeping your license. California DUI attorney Rick Mueller of San Diego County DUI Law Center has been helping people keep their license for over 25 years.

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Discussion of California DUI checkpoints in central coast

California DUI criminal defense lawyers and California drunk driving criminal attorneys met with DUI & DMV lawyers at http://www.sandiegodrunkdrivingattorney.net/articles.html to discuss DUI checkpoints in California.

Every week somewhere on the Central Coast: A line of cars snaking through a line of orange cones and into a police DUI checkpoint. http://www.sandiegodui.com/links.html

Officers peer intently into vehicle windows and talk to the drivers, looking for telltale signs of intoxication: red eyes, slurred speech, alcohol on their breath.

Most drivers pass through quickly and are sent on their way, but a few are found to be driving under the influence. They are taken into custody and their vehicles are impounded.

For the officers involved, these are small victories in the never-ending war against drunken driving and the carnage that it too often causes.

They have learned that “Don’t drink and drive” is more than a slogan, having seen firsthand the injuries and death and shattered lives.

“It gives us a little more drive to seek these drivers under the influence,” said Lt. Rico Flores of the Santa Maria Police Department. “It does hit us personally. No one wants to see anybody hurt or killed, and especially when they’re under the influence.”

Officers know that these types of crashes shouldn’t happen, he said. That knowledge breeds action.

Having officers specifically looking for drunken drivers is highly effective in taking the offenders off the streets, according to local law enforcement officials.

But doing so is a luxury that is typically reserved for officers working special overtime shifts paid for with grant money — funds that could be at risk of disappearing due to tough financial times.

Grants vital

to patrols, checkpoints

Having special patrols on the streets and highways, and checkpoints at which drivers are stopped and checked for signs of driving under the influence and for proper license and registration, has sent the message that those who violate the law will get in trouble, officials say. It also has helped curb hit-and-run crashes.

Deputy Win Smith of the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Department oversees the DUI enforcement program in Santa Barbara County known as “Avoid the 12,” which ties together efforts from a dozen local law-enforcement agencies.

The program, which kicked off in October 2007 and is set to run through the end of 2010, is paid for by a $511,000 grant from the state Office of Traffic Safety, he said.

The grant pays for DUI checkpoints, patrols looking for drunken drivers and other operations related to stopping drunken driving.

Grants are vital to enabling Santa Barbara County law enforcement agencies to have officers focus only on busting inebriated drivers, Smith said.

Smith said that he knows of only two cities in the county — Santa Barbara and Buellton — that have an officer specifically working DUI patrol on a regular basis.

Even then, the Buellton officer only works DUI patrol at certain times, Smith said.

“If we didn’t have the grant, those are the only two ... that are dedicated (to) looking for DUI drivers and that would probably continue,” he said.

Officers doing their regular duties look out for drunken drivers, Smith said, but are often stuck going from call to call without time to really focus on drinking and driving offenders.

Smith has seen firsthand the tragedy that driving under the influence can cause, and he’s not alone.

“You can hardly find anybody nowadays that has not been affected by a drunk driver in some aspect,” Smith said.

Smith can rattle off a list of drunken-driving tragedies he’s responded to: The motorcyclist who lost control and crashed, killing his girlfriend who was riding on the back of the bike; the speeding driver killed when he lost control of his car and rolled the vehicle. Luckily, his passenger survived.

On a personal note, his friend Laura Cleaves, an investigator with the Santa Barbara County District Attorney’s Office, was killed in a collision with an alleged drunken driver in May.

“That, I think, influenced a number of people in the department who knew her,” Smith said. “Many of the fatals that we investigate are caused by people who are under the influence. Drunk drivers.”

Smith said that with the economy struggling, there’s concern that the grant money so vital to cracking down on drunken drivers could dry up.

“To think we’re basically relying on grant money for what is a real serious crime problem concerns me,” he said.

Cracking down

on drunken driving

Smith noted that during DUI crackdowns in December of the last three years, the number of DUI arrests has increased while the number of fatal DUI crashes has also increased.

In the last three weeks of December 2006, 165 people were arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence across the county, and 18 injury collisions were related to driving under the influence.

In the same period in December 2007, 213 DUI arrests were made, and there were 14 injury DUI crashes and one DUI-related death.

In the final three weeks of December 2008, there were 223 DUI arrests, 18 injury DUI crashes and two DUI-related deaths.

As to whether the crackdowns are successful, “it depends on how you define success,” Smith said.

The results could be viewed as either there’s more drunken drivers to be found each year, or officers are taking more drunken drivers off the streets, he said.

The primary purpose of Avoid the 12 is to take drunken drivers off the road, Smith said, but unlicensed drivers are also nabbed.

At a checkpoint run by Santa Maria police on a recent chilly night, a line of cars backed up on Broadway as officers, aided by police Explorer scouts, stopped every few cars to question the driver and determine whether he or she was driving under the influence. They also checked for valid driver’s licenses and registrations.

A couple weeks later, a similar scene played out in Lompoc.

“For the most part, they’re all willing to comply,” said Cpl. Jesse Silva as he watched the Santa Maria operation.

Those driving under the influence or with no license tend to be the only people who take issue with the checkpoints, he said, noting that intoxicated drivers are typically evasive.

Such checkpoints are funded by a grant that went into effect Oct. 1. The DUI Enforcement and Awareness Program is run through a grant given out by the OTS, and lasts 12 months. The grant pays for checkpoints that look for drunken drivers and unlicensed drivers, as well as patrols that watch specifically for drunken drivers.

The department plans on doing two checkpoints a month, Silva said.

Santa Maria Police Chief Danny Macagni said that more than 600 cars had been impounded for unlicensed drivers since the $307,000 grant started in October.

“A lot of times our DUI drivers are unlicensed,” he said.

Hit-and-run crashes have gone down as the checkpoints have been conducted, Macagni said.

Flores said hit-and-run crashes have fallen because they often involve unlicensed drivers who flee the scene so they won’t get caught.

During the Santa Maria checkpoint, 1,053 vehicles were screened and two people were arrested on suspicion of DUI. Seven vehicles were impounded because of unlicensed drivers, and two vehicles were towed because of the DUI arrests.

One or two arrests on suspicion of driving under the influence were typical in a number of recent DUI checkpoints conducted in Santa Maria and Lompoc.

Sgt. Danny Rios of the Lompoc Police Department said his department received a “mini grant” for $111,000 strictly for DUI checkpoints. That grant started in December, and is set to run through September, he said.

The department has already held several checkpoints funded by the grant, he said.

Education key to prevention

DUI enforcement is not just to get drunken drivers off the street, Rios said, but also to educate people about how to report drunken drivers.

He pointed out that drunken driving can have negative effects — both financial and criminal — not only for the driver, but for others as well.

Quite often the DUI driver walks away from a crash relatively unscathed, he said, because he or she is lethargic and somewhat relaxed at the time of impact. Meanwhile, innocent people can pay a huge price, sometimes with their lives.

“(DUI drivers) seem to make it,” Rios said.

“It’s not worth it. It will change your life forever,” he said of drunken driving.

Santa Maria resident Catherine Harper is painfully aware of the human cost of drunken driving.

Her son, 26-year-old Brandon Harper of Santa Maria, was killed two years ago when Miguel Angel Garibay, who was driving drunk while fleeing from sheriff’s deputies, crashed into his pickup after Garibay ran a red light at the intersection of Betteravia Road and Broadway.

Garibay, of Santa Maria, was sentenced to 10 years in prison.

Harper said her father became deathly sick after Brandon died, and her mother is still suffering terribly with grief.

“And I myself, ... I’ll never be the same,” she said. “My life was taken away from me.

“I have to try to live my new life as best I can, but Brandon was my only child, and nobody understands this walk unless they go through it.”

Harper said that she fully supports DUI checkpoints.

“I think they’re great. I think we need more of them.”

California Highway Patrol officers in the county said a “winery grant” from the OTS — more than $600,000 in 2008 — is the main DUI-prevention tool for areas patrolled by the CHP.

The grant focuses on responsible wine tasting, and CHP officers join forces with area vintners, tasting rooms and limo and bus companies to work the program, Barba said.

“It’s an awful big partner,” Barba said of grant money.

Officers have been going the route of education and prevention to stop drunken driving, Barba said.

“And it’s a positive way of saving lives. Getting to people before we have to arrest them,” he added.

Sgt. Mike Clare with the CHP in Santa Maria said that officers are willing and able to work overtime hours to focus on particular offenses.

“When you double up the number of people out there, it makes a big difference,” he said.

Guadalupe Police Chief George Mitchell said that because of his city’s small size, Guadalupe does not qualify for grant money beyond its involvement in Avoid the 12.

“That’s something that we hope will change in the future,” he said. “We’re doing what we can to stay active.”

Another resident who supports the checkpoints is Lanell Summers of Santa Maria, who comes out with her family to watch.

She and other family members turned out recently, bundled up in warm clothes, with lawn chairs that they set up in a parking lot near the action.

“We pretty much stay until it either gets too cold or too slow,” Summers said.

She said she likes to watch the cars get towed away, noting that she’s seen too many hit-and-runs involving alcohol.

Chris Cochran, spokesman for the OTS, said that agencies seeking DUI-enforcement grants must compete for the money.

“We have too many to be able to fund them all, so there’s a little bit of competition to it,” he said.

Cochran noted, however, that there is not an immediate concern of grant money for DUI enforcement drying up, as the money comes from federal sources instead of from the particularly troubled state budget.

Cochran said that close to 40 percent of fatal crashes in California involve alcohol in some way.

California DUI Lawyer - well-known San Diego Attorney Drunk Driving / San Diego DWI Lawyer can help you beat the charge:California DUI Criminal Defense Lawyer list:

California DUI Lawyer


San Diego California DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego California DUI Help

Saturday, February 7, 2009

Former Police Officer gets 4th California DUI

California DUI criminal defense lawyers and California drunk driving criminal defense attorneys at http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/blog.html are told Fresno Police Detective Mark Van Wyhe says Christopher Swengel had no business being behind the wheel of a car. He said, "With his background he should have known better. More so than anybody." In 2007 Swengel got his licensed revoked after his 4th DUI conviction. What makes his case even more shocking is that the 35 year old is a former Tulare County Sheriff Deputy. Van Wyhe said, "Former law enforcement officer or anybody its just blatant disregard for the law and for the safety of the citizens of our city."
Police say Swengel got his first DUI conviction in 1999. The second one came just 9 months later in 2000. His third happened in 2003 and he got the 4th one in 2007. In California driving under the influence is considered a misdemeanor and not a felony until after the 4th conviction or a crash where someone is injured.
Van Wyhe, a DUI Detective who's also involved with Mothers against Drunk Driving, would like to see tougher laws for the first DUI. He said, "Everybody views DUI as a social crime. This misdemeanor can take the life of somebody and ruin plenty of lives in a matter of seconds."
Van Wyhe says time after time Swengel thumbed his nose at the law. Two weeks ago Fresno Police got an anonymous call that the former deputy had been drinking at a bar and, once again, got in his car and drove. Police tried to pull him over at a drive thru, but they say he took off and headed south on Maroa. The detective said, "They estimated 70 to 80 miles an hour. Stop signs or stop lights, he would just continue right through them."
Officers stopped the pursuit worried someone would get hurt. But Van Wyhe found him a few days later through the GPS on Swengel's cell phone. He's relieved to have gotten him off the road before anyone got hurt or even killed. He said, "It's scary for all of us. You and me traveling to work and doing our daily routines. It's scary."
Fresno Police say they were able to get Swengel off the road with the help of an anonymous caller. And they encourage others to do the same by calling 621-4DUI. Swengel is scheduled to be in court February 11th for his latest charges.

List of top California DUI Attorneys:

San Diego California DUI Lawyer


California DUI Attorney


California DUI Attorney


San Diego California DUI Help

Friday, February 6, 2009

Here's something you don't find in a California DUI case

California DUI defense lawyers say here's something.

After fleeing on land and by sea from two drunken-driving crashes that injured others last year, a Lahaina man was sentenced to a 10-year prison term for his fourth and fifth DUI convictions.

James Stiendt, 47, who is also known as Bryan Lammerman, said he was on a "wild rampage" when the collisions occurred 34 days apart on Honoapiilani Highway.

"I don't know why," he said in court last week. "I can't believe I got into a vehicle and drove."

But 2nd Circuit Judge Richard Bissen said he didn't know why Stiendt would be surprised, given his criminal record dating to 1979. He has been incarcerated for convictions in Hawaii, Oregon and California and has a pending warrant in connection with a sexual assault case in Oregon.

"You have been committing crimes for the last 30 years," Bissen told Stiendt. "How can you stand there with a straight face and say you're surprised?

"The only thing that's surprising about any of this is that you have not killed someone. That is what you should be most thankful for."

Stiendt was arrested June 9 after he rear-ended a car while heading toward Lahaina near Milepost 12 in the area known as Lone Pine north of the pali. Although the other driver and several passengers were injured in the 9:20 p.m. crash, Stiendt continued driving for seven miles and was seen weaving into oncoming traffic before police stopped him.

On July 13, Stiendt was arrested again after he lost control of his 1994 Jeep Cherokee while driving toward Lahaina near the Ukumehame firing range at 6:17 p.m. The vehicle slammed into the mountainside, then crossed a double-solid line into the Kihei-bound lane, where it crashed into a Ford Ranger pickup truck, said Deputy Prosecutor Andrew Martin.

Despite being asked to remain at the crash scene, Stiendt ran from the Jeep and swam out to sea. Police said he was swimming south along the highway about one-fourth mile from the collision site before he returned to shore and was arrested.

Officers described Stiendt as belligerent and highly intoxicated, falling to the ground at one point.

Makawao resident Kelly Baldwin, who was in the truck with her husband, William, and their 19-year-old daughter, said Stiendt "almost killed my whole family in one afternoon."

She said her daughter lost two front teeth in the impact along with other injuries. William Baldwin was unable to work for six weeks because of back injuries, his wife said, and the truck was destroyed.

Because Stiendt didn't have insurance, "we're not able to recoup any of our losses, even though the injuries linger on," Kelly Baldwin said in court. "It's just loss after loss after loss.

"The only reason we survived the collision is because we were all wearing our seat belts."

Martin argued for the 10-year prison term, asking that Stiendt be sentenced to consecutive five-year prison terms for both crashes.

After his three prior DUI convictions, Stiendt was ordered to participate in rehabilitation programs, including Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, Martin said.

He said the efforts were "to no avail," with Stiendt continuing to drink and drive.

"He continues to place the people of this community at risk of death or injury, and that absolutely cannot be tolerated for the protection of the community," Martin said.

Deputy Public Defenders Shelly Miyashiro and William "Pili" McGrath argued for a five-year prison term for Stiendt.

"He does take full responsibility for his actions and also the consequences," Miyashiro said.

Stiendt had pleaded no contest to two counts each of felony habitual DUI, driving while his license was revoked for DUI, leaving the scene of a crash involving serious injury, reckless driving and having no insurance, as well as first-degree negligent injury, resisting an order to stop a motor vehicle and inattention to driving.

Turning to the Baldwins in court Friday, he said: "You have my deepest, heartfelt apology. I didn't mean to get in a vehicle and drive. I was drunk when I got into that vehicle. I wasn't thinking clearly."

Stiendt asked the judge to sentence him to "the least amount of time possible," saying he has a bachelor's degree and wanted to work toward becoming a certified substance abuse counselor.

"I have the knowledge," he said.

Bissen ordered a permanent revocation of Stiendt's driver's license. He was ordered to pay $4,410 in restitution and $5,301 in fines and fees.

Martin said he would recommend to the Hawaii Paroling Authority that Stiendt serve the full 10-year prison term without being paroled.


San Diego DUI Lawyer


San Diego DUI


California DUI Attorney


San Diego DUI Help



California DUI Lawyers

Thursday, February 5, 2009

California DUI resource center for drunk driving cases

California DUI Lawyer information provided by a top San Diego California Drunk Driving Attorney for those accused of a San Diego California DUI.



California DUI help for San Diego California DUI court and San Diego California DMV. Complete San Diego California DUI Help to save your California license or other state license.



DUI Attorney Rick Mueller is a Premier San Diego California Drunk Driving Lawyer, San Diego California DUI & San Diego California DMV Defense Attorney with over 24 years of experience. Known as the San Diego California DUI - DMV Guru, San Diego California DUI Lawyer Rick Mueller dedicates 100% of his San Diego DUI law practice to aggressively defending those accused of San Diego Driving Under the Influence.



California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar in Rancho Mirage, California: http://www.cacj.org/Events/forms/DUI%20Brochure%20Final.pdf . The California criminal defense lawyers who attended indicated to the President of the California DUI Lawyers Association that San Diego California DUI criminal defense attorney Rick Mueller was excellent. Rick has been asked to speak again. Take San Diego California DUI Evaluation for your best San Diego California DUI defense attorney strategy and to vigorously protect your important driving privilege, as has been done for many good people who necessarily become San Diego California DUI Clients.






See the below for more information or to contact a DUI Lawyer in California:

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Here's almost $400,000 Napa County, to fight California DUI cases

Sometimes California DUI criminal defense lawyers and California drunk driving defense attorneys can't believe how much money is given to California DUI police enforcement.

Building on recent successes, the “Avoid the 9” taskforce will bring more traffic enforcement to Napa County. New equipment purchases and special traffic enforcement measures are on tap as a result of a recent $372,688 three-year grant awarded by the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to the Napa Police Department, which will administer the grant for the entire county.

“Avoid the 9” sends the message that if you don’t drink and drive, you will avoid arrest by the nine participating law enforcement agencies in the county. Grant activities will target DUI offenders, drivers with suspended or revoked licenses and repeat DUI offenders with warrants or on probation-parole.

DUI/Driver’s License checkpoints, special multi-agencies DUI Task Force enforcement operations, local DUI saturation patrols, warrant/probation sweeps and court sting operations will be utilized.

Funding for the grant comes from the California Office of Traffic Safety through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.


How can you find a qualified California DUI Lawyer ?



Various types of lawyers handle California drunk driving cases, including public defenders, general practitioners, criminal defense lawyers, and California DUI Specialist attorneys.



A California public defender is a California attorney provided at little or no cost to provide defense services to people who financially are unable to hire a private California lawyer. Most California County Districts generally do not offer public defenders services unless you are unemployed, significantly under-employed and/or have no assets.



Some excellent questions to begin asking when searching for a California DUI lawyer are:



What are his or her California DUI attorney's qualifications?



Is he or she a Specialist member of the California DUI Lawyers Association?



Is he or she a member of the National College for DUI Defense?



Whether or not you ultimately end up hiring a California DUI Specialist attorney, it is a smart idea to speak to a California DUI Specialist lawyer in this highly complex field.



You can read more -Why use California's Specialist in DUI and DMV Law http://www.sandiegoduilawyer.com/why.html .



Or try a Free California DUI Evaluation
California Criminal Defense Attorney Rick Mueller recently spoke at the California Attorneys For Criminal Justice annual DUI seminar in Rancho Mirage, California: http://www.cacj.org/Events/forms/DUI%20Brochure%20Final.pdf .