Thursday, June 10, 2010

Faulty breath tests that calculated blood alcohol levels about 20 % higher than reality

About four hundred folks in D.C., convicted of dui/drunk driving dwi driving while intoxicated based on faulty breath tests that calculated blood alcohol levels about 20 % higher than the reality.

Attorney General Peter Nickles said the problem was caused when a police officer set improper baseline levels on the machines. Nickles’ office is contacting the convicted drivers and their lawyers.

About 200 of those convicted spent some time in jail. 1 lawsuit has already been filed based on the revelation.

Nickles’ office launched an investigation after an outside consultant indicated a possible inaccuracy.

Reliability of DUI breath tests may be questioned.

Courts can exclude breath test results because of unreliability.

In 2002, the other Washington Supreme Court ruled a lady could not have her driver's license suspended because of problems with the reliability of a DUI breath test. The lady challenged an administrative suspension of her driver's license. The case looked at the reliability of thermometers used in DUI breath test equipment.

Thermometers are used to test the machines' accuracy. DUI Breath Test operators test the machines by getting a reading from an alcohol and water mixture. The mixture must be kept at 34 degrees centigrade, and that is why the thermometer is important.

That Supreme Court ruled: because evidence was not produced to show that the thermometer on the machine had been certified as reliable, her license could not be suspended.

A court reversed DUI convictions on the grounds that drunk driving breath tests are inherently unreliable. In State v. McGinley, 550 A.2d 1305 (N.J. Super. 1988), a New Jersey Superior Court considered the consolidated appeals of four persons whose convictions involved DUI Breath tests.

While noting the New Jersey Superior Court had essentially taken judicial notice that the DUI Breathalyzer models "900 and 900A are scientifically reliable," that court nevertheless considered new scientific evidence not previously available.

New scientific evidence showed:

1. The DUI breath test machine is designed to test persons having a 2100/1 blood-breath ratio. Such ratios in fact vary from 1100/1 to 3200/1. The variance can produce errors in test results. In fact, high readings were taken in 14% of the population.
2. The temperature of the DUI breath test machine itself varies, thereby affecting test results.
3. Body temperatures vary between human beings, additionally affecting DUI breath test results.
4. Hematocrit, or the solid particles in whole blood, vary - particularly between males and females - which further affects DUI breath test results.
Inherent unreliability exists in different San Diego DUI breath testing machines.

San Diego DUI Breath Test errors can be magnified if San Diego California DUI police do not follow proper procedures, such as Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, including but not limited to continuously observing the subject for 15 minutes prior to breath testing, properly calibrating a San Diego DUI breath test machine, timely checking accuracy, testing blank specimens, etc.